Change in the state of an exploited fish population: From individual indicators to integral assessment
Abstract
We adapted the approach used for the integral assessment of the status of ecosystems in order to assess population status. Classic theoretical concepts of fish population dynamics are the basis of this approach. The convolution of information about changes in several structural and functional characteristics into one integral index was performed using the analytical function of desirability. The index varied 0 to 1 and quantitatively characterizes the state of the population. This approach was tested on the example of the European grayling Thymallus thymallus (Linnaeus, 1758), inhabiting the Vym River (basin of the Northern Dvina River, North of the European part of Russia). The materials were collected during the environmental monitoring carried out by the Institute of Biology of Komi Science Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS) in 2002, 2005–2019. The population parameters used in the calculations (relative abundance; average and maximum age of fish; the proportion of matured individuals in the 4+ age group; average specific growth rate of fish at the age of 6+; body weight of fish in the age group 6+) were characterized on the basis of the control net catches. Compared with the period 2005–2006, the value of the integral index in 2015–2018 decreased by almost two times. This indicates deterioration in the condition of the grayling group in the study area. There were no serious disturbances in the fish habitat in this area. The main hydrochemical and hydrobiological indicators have not changed significantly. The main reason for the observed changes is likely the significant increase in the impact of recreational anglers. The proposed integral index may be useful both for assessing the state of fish populations and for developing measures for the rational management of fish stocks.References
Babayan, V. K., Bobyrev, A. E., Bulgakova, T. I., Vasil’ev, D. A., Il’in, O. I., Kovalev, Y. A., Mihajlov, A. I., Miheev, A. A., Petuhova, N. G., Safaraliev, I. A., Chetyrkin, A. A., & Sheremet’ev, A. D. (2018). Metodicheskie rekomendacii po ocenke zapasov prioritetnyh vidov vodnyh biologicheskih resursov [Methodological recommendations for the assessment of stocks of priority types of aquatic biological resources]. Izdatel’stvo Vserossijskogo Nauchno-Issledovatel’skogo Instituta Rybnogo Hozjajstva i Okeanografii, Moscow (in Russian).
Borisov, V. M. (1978). Selekcionnoe vliyanie promysla na strukturu populyacii dlinnociklovyh ryb [The selective effect of fishing on the structure of the long-cycle fish population]. Voprosy Ikhtiologii, 18(3), 1010–1019 (in Russian).
Derringer, G., & Suich, R. (1980). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology, 12, 214–218.
Dmitriev, V. V. (2009). Opredelenie integral’nogo pokazatelya sostoyaniya prirodnogo ob’ekta kak slozhnoj sistemy [Determination of the integral indicator of the state of a natural object as a complex system]. Obshchestvo, Sreda, Razvitie, 13, 146–165 (in Russian).
Gelashvili, D. B., Korolev, A. A., & Basurov, V. A. (2006). Zonirovanie territorii po stepeni nagruzki stochnymi vodami s pomoshch’yu obobshchyonnoj funkcii zhelatel’nosti (na primere Nizhegorodskoj oblasti) [Territory zonation by the degree of sewage loading with the aid of a generalized function of desirability (with the Nizhniy Novgorod region as an example)]. Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology, 2/3, 129–138 (in Russian).
Hovanov, N. V. (1996). Analiz i sintez pokazatelej pri informacionnom deficite. [Analysis and synthesis of indicators in case of information deficit]. Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Saint-Petersburg (in Russian).
Mina, M. V., & Klevezal, G. A. (1976). Rost zhivotnyh [The growth of animals]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
Nikol’skij, G. V. (1974). Teoriya dinamiki stada ryb kak biologicheskaya osnova ratsional’noj ekspluatatsii i vosproizvodstva rybnykh resursov [The theory of fish school dynamics as a biological basis of sustainable use and reproduction of fish resources]. Pishchevaya Promyshlennost’, Moscow (in Russian).
Pope, K. L., Lochmann, S. E., & Young, M. K. (2010). Methods for assessing fish populations. Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit – Staff Publications.
Pravdin, I. F. (1966). Rukovodstvo po izucheniyu ryb [Guide to the study of fish]. Pishchevaya Promyshlennost’, Moscow (in Russian).
Ricker, W. E. (1975). Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin 191. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa.
Shitikov, V. K., Rozenberg, G. S., & Zinchenko, T. D. (2003). Kolichestvennaya gidroekologiya: Metody sistemnoj identifikacii [Quantitative hydroecology: Methods of systemic identification]. Institut Ekologii Volzhskogo Basseyna RAN, Togliatti (in Russian).
Sidorov, G. P., & Reshetnikov, Y. S. (2014). Lososeobraznye ryby vodoemov evropejskogo Severo-Vostoka [Salmoniformes fish in the ponds of the European Northeast]. Tovarishchestvo Nauchnyh Izdanij KMK, Moscow (in Russian).
Zakharov, A. B., & Boznak, E. I. (2019). Rybnoe naselenie vodotokov Timana [Fish population of Timan watercourses]. Federal’nyy Issledovatel’skiy Tsentr Komi Nauchnyy Tsentr Ural’skogo Otdeleniya RAN, Syktyvkar (in Russian).
Zaporozhec, O. M., Shevlyakov, G. V., Zaporozhec, G. V., & Antonov, N. P. (2007). Vozmozhnosti ispol’zovaniya dannyh o nelegal’nom vylove tihookeanskih lososej dlya real’noj ocenki ih zapasov [The use of the data on the illegal catches of pacific salmon in the prognostic researches]. Voprosy Rybolovstva, 31, 471–483 (in Russian).