Biological and ecological characteristics of Pterocuma pectinata (Malacostraca, Cumacea) in Sasyk Reservoir


  • А. A. Khalaim Odessa I.I. Mechnikov National University
  • M. M. Djurtubaev Odessa I.I. Mechnikov National University
Keywords: cumaceans, postembryonic development, fertility, size-weight characteristics, according to the equation

Abstract

Sasyk (Kunduk) – estuary in the North-Western Black Sea region, is located 120 kmsouth-west of Odessa. In 1979–1980 Sasyk was separated from the sea by a dam, connected by a canal with the Danube and transformed into a reservoir. The fauna of Sasyk underwent significant changes and continues to adapt to the new conditions. This process is of great theoretical and practical interest. Cumacea – a small order, numbering about 600 species; is represented in the Black Sea-Azov basin by 23 species, 11 of them belong to the Caspian complex. Due to their high quantity indicators, they play a significant role in the diet of many species of fish. Pterocuma pectinata (Sowinski, 1893) is the most abundant species of cumacean not only in the Sasyk Reservoir, but also in many bodies of water in the region. However, the biology and ecology of this group of animals has been very inadequately studied. The material for these studies was provided by 120 benthic samples collected from 41 stations in the Sasyk Reservoir in the vegetation period 2013–2014. In this study we also used the material collected by means of H. Hungerford underwater light traps. In total 4,000 specimens of cumaceans were processed. This article shows the results of the studyof the post-embryonic development, fertility and size-mass characteristic of P. pectinata in Sasyk Reservoir. For both sexes for age stages have been distinguished and described for cumaceans: «manca», youth, prebreeding and breeding. Between breeding cycles, females live through one more preparatory (intermediate) stage; the males die. This article provides a detailed morphological and morphometric description of all the stages of the ontogeny of cumaceans. The ratio of number of cumaceans at different stages of ontogeny varies considerably with the seasons. In the summer sexual development of cumacean occurs earlier than in the less warm seasons. A directly proportional relationship was found between body length and fertility of P. pectinata. With decrease in water temperature fertility increases. The corresponding regression equations were obtained. The maximum number of eggs observed in the spring of 2014 – 160 ind. in a female 8.0 mm in length (including the uropod length – 10.2 mm). Mean fecundity was 22 ± 1 and 21 ± 1 ind. in the summer of 2013 and 2014, 40 ± 2 and 32 ± 2 ind. in the autumn of 2013 and 2014, 72 ± 4 ind. in the spring of 2014; during the vegetation season 2014 – 42 ± 2 ind. The smallest oviparous female cumaceans (4–6 mm) were observed in the summer in both years of research with domination of the size group of 4–5 mm. The largest oviparous females (6.1–9.0 mm) were observed in the spring with domination of 6.1–7.0 mm size group. P. pectinata produces at least two generations per year in Sasyk Reservoir. P. pectinata reproduction occurs from March to the beginning of November. The peak of breeding is in early spring (March – April), which contributes to the restoration of population numbers after hibernation. The second stage of reproduction (October – November) is less intense. The lifespan of P. pectinata in the Sasyk Reservoir is about one year. Dependence of individual weight of the body is directly proportional to the length of P. pectinata and varies with the seasons. This article provides a table of the average "size – weight" of cumaceans. The data in this table can be used in ichthyological studies, namely the calculation of the reconstructed weight of the food item – P. pectinata, by size of its undigested chitin skeleton. The maximal length of P. pectinata in Sasyk is 8.5 mm (including uropod length – 10.7 mm), weight – 5 mg, significantly greater than the values specified for the populations of the upper reaches of the Kuibyshev Reservoir and the Caspian Sea. The results of the study significantly complement the existing knowledge of biology and ecology of P. pectinata, and expands our idea of the state of the ecosystem of the Sasyk Reservoir. 

References

Abakumov, V.A. (ed.), 1992. Rukovodstvo po gidrobiologicheskomu monitoringu presnovodnyh jekosistem [Guidelines for hydrobiological monitoring of freshwater ecosystems]. Gidrometeoizdat, SPb (in Russian).
Alimov, A.F., 1989. Vvedenie v produkcionnuju gidrobiologiju [Introduction to production hydrobiology]. Gidrometeoizdat, Lvov (in Russian).
Bǎcescu, M., 1992. Cumacea II (Fam. Nannastacidae, Diastylidae, Pseudocumatidae, Gynodiastylidae and Ceratocumatidae) [Cumacea II (Fam. Nannastacidae, Diastylidae, Pseudocumatidae, Gynodiastylidae and Ceratocumatidae)]. Crustaceorum Catalogus 8, 175–468 (in Romanian).
Berestovskij, E.G., Anisimova, N.A., Denisenko, S.G., Luppova, E.N., Savinov, V.M., Timofeev, S.F., 1989. Zavisimost’ mezhdu razmerami tela i massoj tela nekotoryh bespozvonochnyh i ryb Severo-Vostochnoj Atlantiki [The relationship between body size and weight of some invertebrates and fish of the North-East Atlantic]. Izdatel’stvo Kol’skogo Nauchnogo Centra Akademii Nauk SSSR, Apatity (in Russian).
Berezina, N.A., Petryashev, V.V., 2012. Invasions of higher crustaceans (Crustacea: Malacostraca) in waters of the gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea). Russ. J. Biol. Invasions 3(2), 81–91.
Bij de Vaate, A., Jażdżewski, K., Ketelaars, H.A.M., Gollasch, S., van der Velde, G., 2002. Geographical patterns in range extension of Ponto-Caspian macroinvertebrate species in Europe. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 1159–1174.
Birshtejn, A.J., Vinogradov, L.G., Kondakov, N.N., Kun, M.S., Astahova, T.V., Romanova, N.N. (eds.), 1968. Atlas bespozvonochnyh Kaspijskogo morja [Atlas of invertebrates of the Caspian Sea]. Pishhevaja Promyshlennost’, Мoscow (in Russian).
Cartes, J.E., Sorbe, J.C., 1996. Temporal population structure of deep-water cumaceans from the western Mediterranean slope. Deep-Sea Res. Pt I 43(9), 1423–1438.
Corbera, J., San Vicente, C., Sorbe, J., 2000. Small-scale distribution, life cycle and secondary production of Cumopsis goodsir in Creixell Beach (western Mediterranean). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc UK 80(2), 271–282.
Derzhavin, A.N., 1912. Kaspijskie jelementy v faune bassejna r. Volgi [Caspian elements in the fauna of the Volga River Basin]. Trudy ihtiologicheskoj laboratorii. Astrahan’: Upravlenie Kasp.-Volzhskih rybnyh i tjulen’ih promyslov 2(5), 19–44 (in Russian).
Duncan, T.K., 1984. Life history of Almyracuma proximoculi Jones and Burbank, 1959 (Crustacea: Cumacea) from intertidal fresh-water springs on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. J. Crustacean Biol. 4(3), 356–374.
Filinova, E.I., Malinina, Y.A., Shlyakhtin, G.V., 2008. Bionvasions in macrozoobenthos of the Volgograd Reservoir. Russ. J. Ecol. 39(3), 193–197.
Frolova, L.A., Galanin, I.F., Nazarova, L.B., 2007. Invader species from the family Gobiidae (Pisces: Teleostei) in trophic chains of Kuibyshev water reservoir. In W. Rabitsch, F. Essl, F. Klingenstein (eds.), Biological Invasions – from Ecology to Conservation. Neobiota 7, pp. 233–238.
Frost, S., Huni, A., Kershaw, W.E., 1972. Evaluation of a kicking technique for sampling stream bottom fauna. Can. J. Zool. 49, 167–173.
Gusejnov, M.K., Kurgenjan, V.R., 1985. Donnaja fauna Dagestanskogo pribrezh’ja Srednego Kaspija [The bottom fauna of Dagestan coasts of the Middle Caspian]. Gidrobiologicheskij Zhurnal 21(2), 42–46 (in Russian).
Harchenko, T.A., Timchenko, V.M., Ivanov, A.I., 1990. Bioproduktivnost’ i kachestvo vody Sasykskogo vodohranilishha v uslovijah ego opresnenija [Bioproductivity and water quality of the Sasyk reservoir in conditions of its desalination]. Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (in Russian).
Ioffe, C.I., 1974. Obogashhenie kormovoj bazy dlja ryb v vodohranilishhah SSSR putem akklimatizacii bespozvonochnyh [Enrichment of forage fish in the reservoirs of the USSR through acclimatization of invertebrates]. Izvestija Gosudarstvennogo Nauchno-Issledovatel’skogo Instituta Ozernogo i Rechnogo Rybnogo Hozjajstva 100, 3–226 (in Russian).
Ivanova, M.B., Vasilenko, S.V., 1987. Relationship between number of eggs, brood weight and female body weight in Crustacea. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 72(2), 144–169.
Ivanova, N.O., 2010. Gidrologichnyj rezhym Sasyks’kogo vodoshovyshha [Hydrological regime of the Sasik reservoir]. Nauk. Zap. Ternop. Nac. Ped. Univ. Ser. Biol. 43 (2), 213–215 (in Ukrainian).
Jaume, D., Boxshall, G.A., 2008. Global diversity of cumaceans and tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Cumacea and Tanaidacea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595(1), 225–230.
Karatayev, A.Y., Mastitsky, S.E., Burlakova, L.E., Olenin, S., 2008. Past, current, and future of the central European corridor for aquatic invasions in Belarus. Biol. Invasions 10(2), 215–232.
Khalaim, A.A., 2014a. Praktika primenenija podvodnoj svetolovushki modeli H. Hangerforda dlja sbora donnyh bespozvonochnyh v Sasykskom vodohranilishhe (Odesskaja oblast’) [The practice of using H. Hungerford underwater light traps for collection of benthic invertebrates of the Sasyk reservoir (Odessa region)]. In: O.V. Fedonenko (ed.), Suchasni problemy vykladannja ta naukovyh doslidzhen’ biologii’ u VNZ Ukrai’ny: Materialy I Vseukrai’ns’koi’ naukovo-praktychnoi’ konferencii’ [Modern problems of teaching and research biology at the University of Ukraine]. Izdatel’stvo DNU, Dnipropetrovsk, pp. 181–184 (in Russian).
Khalaim, A.A., 2014b. Ponto-kaspijskaja reliktovaja fauna v Sasykskom vodohranilishhe [Ponto-Caspian relict fauna in the Sasyk reservoir]. In: V. Fil’ (ed.), Suchasnyj stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku bio- i agrocenoziv v umovah postijnogo tehnogennogo zabrudnennja [Bio- and agrocenosises modern state and perspectives in the constant technogenic pollution circumstences]. Vydavnychyj Viddil Drogobyc’kogo Derzhavnogo Pedagogichnogo Universytetu imeni Ivana Franka, Drogobych, pp. 193–197 (in Russian).
Khalaim, A.A., Dzhurtubaev, V.V., 2015. Kumovye raki (Crustacea, Cumacea) vodohranilishha Sasyk [Cumaceans (Cumacea) of Sasyk reservoir]. Vіsn. Odes’k. Nac. Univ. Ser. Biol. 20(1), 161–167 (in Russian).
Kharchenko, T.A., 2004. Biodiversity of the Ponto-Caspian Relict Fauna in the Danube Basin (Review). Hydrobiological Journal. 41(2), 57–79.
Leppäkoski, E., Gollasch, S., Olenin, S. (eds.), 2002. Invasive aquatic species of Europe: Distribution, impacts and management. Kluwer Publishers, Dordrecht.
Lomakina, N.B., 1958. Kumovye raki (Cumacea) morej SSSR [Cumaceans (Cumacea) of the seas of USSR]. Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR, Moscow – Leningrad (in Russian).
Martin, J.W., Davis, G.E., 2001. An updated classification of the recent Crustacea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles.
Morduhaj-Boltovskoj, F.D. (ed.), 1969. Opredelitel’ fauny Chernogo i Azovskogo morej [Identification guide of the fauna of the Black and Azov Seas]. Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (in Russian).
Olenin, S., Leppäkoski, E., 1999. Non-native animals in the Baltic Sea: Alteration of benthic habitats in coastal inlets and lagoons. Hydrobiologia 393, 233–243.
Opalatenko, L.K., 1979. Pitanie i pishhevye otnoshenija bychka-pesochnika i bychka-krugljaka v Severnom Kaspii [Feeding and food relationships of monkey goby and southern harvest fish in the northern Caspian Sea]. Gidrobiologicheskij Zhurnal 15(2), 84–85 (in Russian).
Orlova, M.I., Telesh, I.V., Berezina, N.A., Antsulevich, A.E., Maximov, A.A., Litvinchuk, L.F., 2006. Effects of nonindigenous species on diversity and community functioning in the eastern Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea). Helgoland Mar. Res. 2, 98–105.
Pligin, J.V., Emel’janova, L.V., 1989. Itogi akklimatizacii bespozvonochnyh Kaspijskoj fauny v Dnepre i ego vodohranilishhah [Results of the acclimation of invertebrate fauna of the Caspian in Dnepr River and its reservoirs]. Gidrobiologicheskij Zhurnal 25(1), 3–11 (in Russian).
Romanenko, V.D. (ed.), 2006. Metody gidroekologichnyh doslidzhen’ poverhnevyh vod [Hydroecological research methods of surface water]. Logos, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
Stepanenko, N.M., 1986. Formirovanie zoobentosa limana Sasyk v processe ego gidrotehnicheskih preobrazovanij [Formation of zoobenthos Sasyk estuary in the process of hydrotechnical transformations]. Gidrobiologicheskij Zhurnal 22 (1), 66–70 (in Russian).
Vereshchaka, A.L., Anokhina, L.L., 2015. Biodiversity and diel variation of the benthohyponeuston: A case study of the Northeast Black Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf S. 167(20), 487–498.
Voloshkevich, A.N., 1991. Osobennosti formirovanija i racional’nogo ispol’zovanija rybnyh zapasov opresnennogo vodojoma – Sasykskogo vodohranilishha [Features of formation and rational use of fish resources desalinated reservoir – Sasyk reservoir]. Moscow (in Russian).
Winberg, G.G. (ed.), 1968. Metody opredelenija produkcii vodnyh zhivotnyh [Methods for determining the production of aquatic animals]. Vysshaja Shkola, Minsk (in Russian).
Yakovlev, V.A., Yakovleva, A.V., 2012. Kumovye rakoobraznye (Crustacea: Cumacea) v verhnih plesah Kujbyshevskogo vodohranilishha [Cumaceans crustaceans (Crustacea: Cumacea) in the upper reaches of the Kuibyshev Reservoir]. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta 154(2), 216–227 (in Russian).
Yakovleva, A.V., Yakovlev, V.A., 2010. Modern fauna and quantitative parameters of invasive invertebrates in zoobentos of upper reaches of the Kuybyshev Reservoir, Russia. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 1(3), 232–241.
Published
2016-02-20
Section
Articles