Applying plant disturbance indicators to reveal the hemeroby of soil macrofauna species
Abstract
Hemeroby is an integrated indicator for measuring human impacts on environmental systems. Hemeroby has a complex nature and a variety of mechanisms to affect ecosystems. Hemeroby is often used to assess disturbances in different vegetation types but this concept has seldom been evaluated for animals. The role of the hemeroby gradient in structuring the soil macrofauna community was investigated. The experimental polygon was located in Botanical Garden of the Oles Honchar Dnipro National University (Dnipro City, Ukraine). There were 20 sites within the polygon. On each of them at 105 points samples of soil macrofauna were taken, soil penetration resistance, electrical conductivity of soil, depth of litter, height of grasses were measured. Within each site, a description of the vegetation cover was made. Based on the description of the vegetation, an indication of the level of ecosystem hemeroby within the polygons was conducted. In total, 48,457 invertebrate (Annelida, Arthropoda, and Mollusca) individuals of 6 classes, 13 orders, 50 families and 83 species or parataxonomic units were recorded. Phytoindication reveals that the level of hemeroby within the studied polygons varies from 34.9 to 67.2. The model V and VI from the HOFJO-list were the most optimal model of the species response to hemeroby gradient. The weighted average factor value was used to assess the optimal factor level for the species in a symmetrical bell-shaped response model. The optimal factor level of the hemeroby for the soil macrofauna species ranges from 34.9 to 66.0. Species also differ in degree of specialization to the factor of hemeroby. There was a regular change in the soil macrofauna community size and diversity in the hemeroby gradient. The limiting influence of anthropogenic transformation of the environment on the abundance of soil macrofauna community is clearly marked at the level of hemeroby above average. Species diversity of the community is greatest at moderate hemeroby level. Both relatively little transformed habitats and strongly transformed ones are characterized by lower species richness of the soil macrofauna community. The Shannon index shows a clear upward trend with increasing hemeroby. The Pielou index indicates that the main reason for this trend is an increase in community evenness with increasing hemeroby. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis was fully supported with respect to species richness. For the number of species, there is indeed a certain level of heterogeneity at which the number of species is highest. For another aspect of diversity, evenness, this pattern is not true. The evenness increases with increasing habitat disturbance. This result is due to a decrease in the abundance of dominant species.References
Andreeva, R. V. (1990). Opredelitel’ lichinok slepnej [Identification key to the horsefly larvae e]. Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (in Russian).
Austin, M. (1999). The potential contribution of vegetation ecology to biodiversity research. Ecography, 22, 465–484.
Austin, M. P. (1987). Models for the analysis of species’ response to environmenttal gradients. Vegetatio, 69, 35–45.
Borhidi, A. (1995). Social behaviour types, the naturalness and relative ecological indicator values of the higher plants in the Hungarian flora. Acta Botanica Hungarica, 39, 97–181.
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin.
Buzuk, G. N. (2017). Phytoindication with ecological scales and regression analysis: Environmental index. Bulletin of Pharmacy, 76, 31–37.
Byrne, L., & Bruns, M. (2004). The effects of lawn management on soil microarthropods. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology, 21, 151–156.
Cherny, N. G., & Golovach, S. J. (1993). Dvuparnonogie mnogonozhki ravninnoj territorii Ukrainy [Millipedes of the plain territory of Ukraine]. Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (in Russian).
Collins, J., Kinzig, A., Grimm, N., Fagan, W. F., Hope, D., Wu, J., & Borer, E. T. (2000). A new urban ecology. American Scientist, 88(5), 416–425.
Connell, J. H. (1978). Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, 199, 1302–1310.
Didukh, Y. P. (2011). The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication. Phytosociocentre, Kyiv.
Gilyarov, M. S. (1964). Opredelitel’ obitayushhikh v pochve lichinok nasekomykh [Identification key of soil-inhabiting insect larvae]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
Goncharenko, I. V. (2017). Fitoindykaciya antropogennogo navantazhennya [Phytoindication of anthropogenic factor]. Serednyak T. K., Dnipro (in Ukranian).
Gray, J. S. (1989). Effects of environmental stress on species rich assemblages. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 37, 19–32.
Gural-Sverlova, N. V., & Gural, R. I. (2012). Vyznachnyk nazemnykh molyuskiv Ukrayiny [Identification book of the terrestrial molluscs of Ukraine]. State Museum of Natural History, Lviv (in Ukranian).
Jalas, J. (1955). Hemerobe und Hemerochore Pflanzenarten. Ein Terminologischer Reformversuch. Acta Societas Flora Fauna Fennica, 72, 1–15.
Kabakov, O. N. (2006). Plastinchatousye zhuki podsemejstva Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) fauny Rossii i sopredelnykh stran [Scarab beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) of Russia and adjacent countries]. KMK, Moscow (in Russian).
Kowarik, I. (1990). Some responses of flora and vegetation to urbanization in Central Europe. In: Sukopp, H., Hejny, S., & Kowarik, I. (Eds.). Plants and plant communities in the urban environment. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague. Pp. 45–74.
Krivolutsky, D. A. (1992). Pochvennaya fauna v ekologicheskom kontrole [Soil fauna in ecological control]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
Krivosheina, M. G. (2012). Identification book of the families and genera of Palaearctic dipteran insects of the suborder Nematocera, based on larvae. KMK, Moscow.
Kryzhanovsky, O. L. (1964). Carabidae – Zhuzheliczy [Carabidae – ground beetles]. In: Bey-Bienko, G. A. (Ed.). Opredelitel’ nasekomykh evropejskoj chasti SSSR. Tom 2. Zhestkokrylye i veerokrylye [Insects of the European part of the USSR. Vol. 5. Coleoptera and Strepsiptera]. Nauka, Moscow. Pp. 23–68 (in Russian).
Kunah, O. N., Zhukov, O. V., & Pahomov, A. Y. (2010). Morfologiya doshhovykh cherv’yakiv (Lumbricidae) [Earthworm morphology (Lumbricidae)]. DNU University Press, Dnipropetrovsk (in Ukranian).
Lavelle, P., Senapati, B., & Barros, E. (2003). Soil macrofauna. In: Schroth, G., & Sinclair, F. L. (Eds.). Trees, crops and soil fertility: Concepts and research methods. CAB International, Wallingford. Pp. 303–323.
Legendre, P., & Birks, H. J. B. (2012). From classical to canonical ordination. In: Birks, H. J. B., Lotter, A. F., Juggins, S., & Smol, J. P. (Eds.). Tracking environmental change using lake sediments: Data handling and numerical techniques. Springer, Dordrecht. Pp. 201–248.
Niemelä, J. (1999). Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8(1), 119–131.
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., & Wagner, H. (2018). Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-2.
Perel, T. S. (1979). Rasprostranenie i zakonomernosti raspredeleniya dozhdevykh chervej fauny SSSR [Spread and regularity of the distribution of the earthworms of the USSR fauna]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
Schmolzer, K. (1965). Ordnung Isopoda (Landasseln), Liferung 4, 5. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.
Steinhardt, U., Herzog, F., Lausch, A., Miller, E., & Lehmann, S. (1999). Hemeroby index for landscape monitoring and evaluation. In: Pykh, Y. A. (Ed.). Environmental indices – system analysis approach. EOLSS Publishing, Oxford. Pp. 237–254.
Tuf, I. H., & Tufova, J. (2008). Proposal of ecological classification of centipede, millipede and terrestrial isopod faunas for evaluation of habitat quality in Czech Republic. Časopis Slezského Zemského Muzea, Série A, Vědy Přírodní, 57, 37–44.
Wiens, J. A. (1989). The ecology of bird communities. Vol. 1 and 2. Cambridge Studies in Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wilson, J. B. (1994). The intermediate disturbance hypothesis of species coexistence is based on patch dynamics. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 18(2), 176–181.
Yorkina, N., Maslikova, K., Kunah, O., & Zhukov, O. (2018). Analysis of the spatial organization of Vallonia pulchella (Muller, 1774) ecological niche in Technosols (Nikopol Manganese Ore Basin, Ukraine). Ecologica Montenegrina, 17, 29–45.
Zalesskaya, N. T. (1978). Opredelitel’ mnogonozhek-kostyanok SSSR [Identification key to Lithobiidae of USSR]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).