The temporal dynamics of zooplankton communities of different types of water bodies within Ichniansky National Park

  • Z. V. Burian Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University
  • V. M. Trokhymets Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University
Keywords: zooplankton, protected area, Ukraine


In recent decades, the influence of anthropogenic impact on aquatic ecosystems has increased. This has led to a restructuring of aquatic ecosystems and affected the structural and functional organization of groups of aquatic organisms, causing qualitative and quantitative changes. Particular attention is drawn to the different types of water bodies of protected areas like IchnyanskyNational Park, which is located in Ichnyansky district of Chernihiv region. This park is a newly created one, so the reduction in intensity of anthropogenic pressure can be traced within its waters. Zooplankton plays an important role in the functioning of trophic networks because it transfers energy from producers and primary consumers to young fish and planktonophagous fish. Therefore, three main groups of zooplankton were chosen as the object of study: rotifers (class Eurotatoria), cladocerans (class Branchiopoda, order Cladocera), different age stages of copepods (class Copepoda), and also ostracods (Class Ostracoda). The zooplankton used as research material was collected in the daytime in spring (April), summer (late July – early August) and autumn (late September – early October) in the years 2015–2016 from ten experimental stations. During this period 81 species of zooplankton were recorded within heterogeneous reservoirs of IchnianskyNational Park. Monogonont rotifers (subclass Monogononta) included 35 species (43% of all species) and bdelloid rotifers (subclass Bdelloidea), cladocerns, comprised 28 species (35%), and copepods included 18 species (22%). The faunal range of zooplankton over different years and seasons was characterized by the predominance of the rotator complex in spring, rotator-cladocerans and cladocerans in summer, and of the cladocerans complex in autumn. This was due to the formation during spring and summer of favourable conditions in the waters for filter feeders, which consist generally of rotifers and cladocerans. In autumn the water released large amounts of organic matter that caused a reduction in the species diversity of rotifers. Zooplankton also is characterized by the considerable ecological diversity. The range of environmental groups of zooplankton over two years was characterized by a predominance of the pelagic and benthic group of phytophiles. Pelagic representatives included 35 (43%) of 81 species, the bottom group – 20 (25%), phytophiles – 26 (32%). Rotifers dominated in the pelagic group – 18 (51%) species out of 35, and cladocerans – among the bottom group – 10 (50%) species out of 20. Zooplankton species also are distinguished by their feeding type. They represented three trophic groups: peaceful – 64 (79%) out of 81 species, omnivorous – 6 (7%) and predators – 11 (14%). Quantitative indicators of zooplankton at most stations in different seasons were defined as “very low” (less than 5,000 ind./m3 and less than 0.3 g/m3), “low” (5,000–50,000 ind./m3 and 0.3–1.0 g/m3), “below average” (5,000–50,000 ind./m3 and 0.3–1.0 g/m3) rates, occasionally – "average" (51–250,000 ind./m3 and 1.1–5.0 g/m3), “medium high” (501,000–1,000,000 ind./m3 and 1.1–5.0 g/m3). High densities of zooplankton were recorded in spring for a temporary reservoir and amounted to 3,016,000 ind./m3. 


Arsan, O. M. (ed.) (2006). Metody gіdroekologіchnyh doslіdzhen' poverhnevyh vod [Methods of hydroecological investigations of surface water]. Logos, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
Baranyi, C., Hein, T., Holarek, C., Keckeis, F., & Schiemer, F. (2002). Zooplankton biomass and community structure in a Danube River floodplain system. Freshwater Biology, 47(3), 473–482.
Berezina, N. A. (1989). Praktikum po gidrobiologii [Workshop on Hydrobiology]. Agropromizdat, Moscow (in Russian).
Bobyliov, Y. P., Brygadyrenko, V. V., Bulakhov, V. L., Gaichenko, V. A., Gasso, V. Y., Didukh, Y. P., Ivashov, A. V., Kucheriavyi, V. P., Maliovanyi, M. S., Mytsyk, L. P., Pakhomov, O. Y., Tsaryk, I. V., Shabanov, D. A. (2014). Ekologija [Ecology]. Folio, Kharkiv (in Ukrainian).
Booker, J., & Cheruvelil, K. S. (2011). Are zooplankton food resources poorin the vegetated littoral zone of shallow lakes? Freshwater Biology, 51(12), 2459–2472.
Boruckij, E. V., Stepanova, L. A., & Kos, S. (1991). Opredelitel' Calanoida presnyh vod SSSR [Determinant of Calanoida of fresh waters of USSR]. Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian).
Chalkia, E., & Kehayias, G. (2013). Zooplankton and environmental factors of a recovering eutrophic lake (Lysimachia Lake, Western Greece). Biologia, 68(3), 459–469.
Czerniawski, R., & Domagał, J. (2013). Reduction of zooplankton communities in small lake outlets in relation to abiotic and biotic factors. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 42(2), 123–131.
De los Ríos-Escalante, P. R. (2010). The ecology of the crustacean zooplankton in central and Southern Patagonian shallow ponds. Crustacean Zooplankton Communities in Chilean Inland Waters, 12, 79–90.
Dulić, Z., Mitrović-Tutundžić, V., Marcović, Z., & Živić, I. (2006). Monitoring water quality using zooplankton organisms as bioindicators at the Dubica fish farm, Serbia. Archives of Biological Sciences, 58(4), 245–248.
Forró, I., Korovchinsky, N. M., Kotov, A. A., & Petusek, A. (2008). Global diver-sity of cladocerans (Cladocera; Crustacea). Hydrobiologia, 595, 177–184.
Gophe, M. (2015). Ecophysiology of Lake Kinneret (Israel) zooplankton. Open Journal of Ecology, 5(5), 187–198.
Guevara, G., Lozano, P., Reinoso, G., & Villa, F. (2009). Horizontal and seasonal patterns of tropical zooplankton from the eutrophic Prado Reservoir (Colombia). Limnologica – Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 39(2), 128–139.
Güher, H., Erdoğan, S., Kırgız, T., & Çamur-Elipek, B. (2011). The Dynamics of zooplankton in National Park of Lake Gala (Edirne-Turkey). Acta Zoologia Bulgarica, 63(2), 157–168.
Havel, J. E., & Shurin, J. B. (2004). Mechanisms, effects, and scales of dispersal in freshwater zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography, 49(4), 1229–1238.
Lance, C. R., & Bennett, D. H. (2003). Seasonal zooplankton abundance and size fluctuations across spatial scales in Lake Pend Oreille, Idaho. Freshwater Ecology, 17(2), 277–290.
Larson, G. L., Hoffman, R., McIntire, C. D., Lienkaemper, G., & Samora, B. (2008). Zooplankton assemblages in montane lakes and ponds of Mount Rainier National Park, Washington State, USA. Journal of Plankton Research, 31(3), 273–285.
Manujlova, E. F. (1964). Vetvistousye rachki (Cladocera) fauny SSSR [Cladocerans (Cladocera) fauna of the USSR]. Nauka, Moscow, Leningrad (in Russian).
Martin, J. W., & Davis, G. E. (2001). An updated classification of the recent Crustacea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles Country, Los Angeles.
Meerhoff, M., Iglesias, C., Mello, F. T., Clemente, J. M., Jensen, E., Lauridsen, T. L., & Jeppesen, E. (2007). Effects of habitat complexity on community structure and predator avoidance behaviour of littoral zooplankton in temperate versus subtropical shallow lakes. Freshwater Biology, 52(6), 1009–1021.
Monchenko, V. I. (2003). Vol'nozhivushhie ciklopovidnye kopepody Ponto-Kaspijs'kogo bassejna [Free-living cyclopoid copepods of Ponto-Kaspian basin]. Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (in Russian).
Nazaruk, K. M., & Khamar, I. S. (2011). Zooplankton of some Lakes of the Shatsk National Natural Park. Hydrobiological Journal, 47(6), 33–44.
Ortega-Mayagoitia, E., Armengol, X., & Rojo, C. (2000). Structure and dynamics of zooplankton in a semi-arid wetland, the National Park Las Tablas de Daimiel (Spain). Wetlands, 20(4), 629–638.
Pandey, A., & Upadhyay, H. C. (2015). Studies on zooplankton diversity of Western Ramganga River in Almora (Uttarakhand) India. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(5), 1192–1194.
Pashkova, O. V. (2013). Zooplankton as indicator of organic and toxic pollution and ecological state of aquatic ecosystems (A review). Hydrobiological Journal, 49(2), 3–20.
Pesenko, J. A. (1982). Principy i metody kolichestvennogo analiza v faunisticheskih issledovanijah [Principles and methods of quantitative analysis in the faunal studies]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
Segers, H. (2007). Annotated checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution. Magnolia Press, New Zealand.
Segers, H. (2008). Global diversity of rotifers (Rotifera) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia, 595, 49–59.
Sollberger, P. J., Paulson, L. J., & Sollberger, P. J. (1992). Littoral and limnetic zooplankton communities in Lake Mead, Nevada-Arisona, USA. Hydrobiologia, 237(3), 175–184.
Soto, D., & Rios, P. (2006). Influence of trophic status and conductivity on zooplankton composition in lakes and ponds of Torres del Paine National Park (Chile). Biologia, 61(5), 541–546.
Trokhymets, V. N., Sydorenko, M. V., & Podobaylo, A. V. (2011). The Uday river’s littoral zooplankton in the region of the national nature park «Pyriatynskiy». Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, Ecology, 20(1), 131–138.
Uttah, E. C., Uttah, C., Akpa, P. A., Ikpeme, E. M., Ogbeche, J., Usip, L., & Asor, J. (2010). Bio-survey of plankton as indicators of water quality for recreational activities in Calabar River, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 12(2), 35–42.
Xu, F. L, Tao, S., Dawson, R. W., Li, P., & Cao, J. (2001). Lake ecosystems health assessment: Indicators and methods. Water Research, 12(2), 3157–3167.
Zhadin, V. N. (1960). Metody gidrobiologicheskogo issledovanija [Methods of hydrobiological studies]. Vysshaja Shkola, Moscow (in Russian).