Structural comparative analysis of forest and steppe plant communities in the south of Kryvyi Rih region


  • N. Y. Shevchuk Kryvyi Rih Botanical Garden of NAS of Ukraine
Keywords: floristic structure; forest plantations; steppe phytocoenoses; light structure; grazing pressure

Abstract

We made a comparative analysis of the floristic structure of 11 various-aged (30–50-year-old) forest and four steppe communities in the south of Kryvyi Rih region. We ascertained that the forest communities have low specific richness (2–90 species), whereas steppe ones contain from 167 to 251 species. The ten families leading in the species number are: Asteraceae, Poaceae, Rosaceae, Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Boraginaceae, Apiaceae, Brassicaceae and Polygonaceae. Specific representation of the steppe communities depends on the geomorphologic formation, grazing pressure, soil cover composition; respective order of families differs slightly: Asteraceae, Poaceae, Fabaceae, Rosaceae, Scrophulariaceae, Lamiaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Brassicaceae, Apiaceae, Boraginaceae. The core of the geographical structure of forest vegetation is the species with a palaearctic type of range (30.3–54.5%), and in the steppe, species with the Black Sea area group (15.6–24.0%). The second and the third most numerous in forest groups are groups of species of transitional areas (3.6–23.3%) and holarctic species (7.0–17.2%). In the steppe communities, almost the same proportions are formed by the species of the palaearctic group and the plants of group of transitional areas (15.8–23.1% and 18.3–21.7% respectively). We revealed that in the forest and steppe communities the most numerous group in the spectra is the biomorph of hemicryptophytes (25.6–42.4% and 45.8–47.0% respectively). According to the structure of the above-ground shoots, identical proportions are formed by rosetteless and semi-rosetted species (38.3–60.5% and 37.2–56.7% respectively) in the forest communities, and semi-rosetted species (47.4–49.1%) in the steppe ones; as for the type of structure of underground shoots in forest communities, species without special underground formations (33.3–65.1%) and caudex formations (18.6–36.4%) prevail, and, in the steppe communities – caudex species do (39.1–47.9%); xeromesophytes (33.3–100%), and mesoxerophytes (32.9–40.6%) dominate in the hygrospectra of forest and steppe communities respectively; in heliospectra, there is the predominance of heliophytes (62.3–97.1% and 50.8–67.5% respectively); in trophoscopes, the mesotrophs are prevalent (57.1–98.4% and 47.0–52.1% respectively). The ecological and coenotic spectrum of forest communities is characterized by the domination of synanthropophants (36.3–58.6%), and in steppe ones – steppants (51.8–55.0%). We revealed the similarity of the floristic composition of forest and steppe communities (6.8–39.4%), and the largest index is noted for the plot with a strict nature reserve regime (19.4–39.4%). In forest communities, this value is 15.6–66.7%, and it varies in different-aged plantations of the same species. The analysis shows that there are significant differences in the floristic and biomorphological composition of forest and steppe communities; it confirms the concept of O.L. Belgard on the environment transforming function of artificial steppe forests, changing the biotic circulation, which is inherent in the steppes.

References

Belgard, A. L. (1950). Lesnaja rastitelnost jugo-vostoka USSR [Forest vegetation of the southeast of the Ukrainian SSR]. Publishing House of T. G. Shevchenko Kiev State University, Kiev (in Russian).


Belgard, A. L. (1960). K teorii struktury iskusstvennogo lesnogo soobshhestva v stepi [To the theory of the structure of an artificial forest community in the steppe]. In: Artificial forests of the steppe zone of Ukraine. Kharkiv, 17–32 (in Russian).


Bölöni, J., Molnár, Z., Horváth, F., & Illyés, E. (2008). Naturalness-based habitat quality of the hungarian (semi-)natural habitats. Acta Botanica Hungarica 50(Suppl.), 149–159.


Boydak, M. (1997). Establishment and management of trees and stands in arid zones. In: XI World Forestry Congress Congress-Pre-Congress: Satellite Meeting on International Expert Consultation on the Role of Forestry in Combating Desertification. Antalya. Pp. 1–22.


Boydak, M., & Сalıskan, S. (2015). Afforestation in arid and semi-arid region. Ankara.


Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2015). Vplyv zimknenosti kron derev i pokryttja trav’janystyh roslyn na strukturu pidstylkovoi' mezofauny shyrokolystjanyh lisiv stepovoi' zony Ukrai'ny [Influence of tree crown density and density of the herbaceous layer on the structure of litter macrofauna of deciduous forests of Ukraine’s steppe zone]. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, Ecology 23(2), 134–148.


Calıskan, S., & Boydak, M. (2017). Afforestation of arid and semiarid ecosystems in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 41, 317–330.


Diduh, J. P. (2005). Ekologo-energetychni aspekty u spivvidnoshenni lisovyh i stepovyh ekosystem [Ecological-energy aspects in the ratio of forest and steppe ecosystems]. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 62(4), 455–467 (in Ukrainian).


Erdős, L., Magnes, M., & Bátori, Z. (2015). The effects of land-use history and landscape context on habitat naturalness: An assessment using relative naturalness indicator values. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 3(5), 146–150.


Erdős, L., Tölgyesi, C., Bátori, Z., Semenishchenkov, Y., & Magnes, M. (2017). The influence of forest/grassland proportion on the species composition, diversity and natural values of an eastern Austrian forest-steppe. Russian Journal of Ecology, 48(4), 350–357.


Erdős, L., Tölgyesi, C., Cseh, V., Tolnay, D., Cserhalmi, D., Körmöczi, L., Gellény, K., & Bátori, Z. (2015). Vegetation history, recent dynamics and future prospects of a Hungarian sandy forest-steppe reserve: Forest-grassland relations, tree species composition and size-class distribution. Community Ecology, 16(1), 95–105.


Faly, L. I., & Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2018). Influence of the herbaceous layer and litter depth on the spatial distribution of litter macrofauna in a forest plantation. Biosystems Diversity, 26(1), 46–51.


Golubev, V. (1972). Princip postroenija i soderzhanija linejnoj sistemy zhiznennyh form pokrytosemennyh rastenij [The principle of construction and content of the linear system of life forms angiosperms]. Bulletin of the Moscow Society of Naturalists. The Exaltation of Biology, 77(6), 72–80 (in Russian).


Ivanko, I. (1999). Rol svetovoj struktury lesnyh soobshhestv v stepi v formirovanii i produktivnosti travjanogo pokrova [The role of the light structure of forest communities in the steppe in the formation and productivity of the grass cover]. Ecology and Noosphereology, 6(1–2), 84–91 (in Russian).


Korotkov, V. (2017). Osnovnye koncepcii i metody vosstanovlenija prirodnyh lesov vostochnoj evropy [Basic concepts and methods of restoration of natural forests in Eastern Europe]. Russian Journal of Ecosystem Ecology, 2(1), 1–18 (in Russian).


Korshikov, I., & Mudrik, E. (2006). Elevation-dependent genetic variation of plants and seed embryos in the Crimea Mountain population of Pinus pallasiana D. Don. Russian Journal of Ecology, 37(2), 79–83.


Korshikov, I., & Pirko, Y. (2002). Genetic variation and differentiation of peat-bog and dry-meadow populations of the dwarf mountain Pine Pinus mugo Turra in the highlands of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Russian Journal of Genetics, 38(9), 1044–1050.


Krasova, O., Shevchuk, N., & Korshykov, I. (2015). Florystychna ta cenotychna harakterystyky monitoryngovyh stepovyh diljanok pivdennoi' chastyny Kryvorizhzhja [Floristic and coenotic characteristics of steppe monitoring sites in the southern part of Kryvyi Rih area]. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 72(5), 431–441 (in Ukrainian).


Kryshen', A., Gnatjuk, E., Genikova, N., & Ryzhkova, N. (2016). Sravnitel'nyj analiz jekologo-cenoticheskih grupp v strukture parcial'nyh flor antropogenno fragmentirovannoj territorii [Comparative analysis of ecological-coenotic groups in the structure of partial floras of anthropogenically fragmented territory]. Botanical Journal, 101(5), 489–516 (in Russian).


Kucherevskyj, V. (2004). Konspekt flory Pravoberezhnogo stepovogo Prydniprov’ja [Abstract of the flora of the Right Bank steppe Dnieper]. Prospekt, Dnipropetrovsk (in Ukrainian).


Lashchinskiy, N., Korolyuk, A., Makunina, N., Anenkhonov, O., & Hongyan, L. (2017). Longitudinal changes in species composition of forestsand grasslands across the North Asian forest steppe zone. Folia Geobotanica, 52(2), 175–197.


Lebedeva, V., Tikhodeyeva, M., & Ipatov, V. (2016). O neodnorodnosti rastitel'nogo pokrova, lugov i lesov [About heterogeneity of the vegetation cover of meadows and forests]. Botanical Journal, 101(4), 358–376 (in Russian).


Matus, G., Tóthmérész, B., & Papp, M. (2003). Restoration prospects of abandoned species-rich grassland in Hungary. Article in Applied Vegetation Science, 6(2), 169–178.


Matveev, N. (2015). Stepnye lesa Zavolzhja [Steppe forests of the Trans-Volga region]. Samara Luke: Problems of Regional and Global Ecology, 24(4), 48–71 (in Russian).


Oldenderfer, M., & Bljeshfild, R. (1989). Klasternyj analiz [Cluster analysis]. In: Factorial, discriminant and cluster analysis. Finance and Statistics, Мoscow. Pp. 139–181 (in Russian).


Raunkiaer, C. (1934). The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Clarendon Press. Oxford.


Reinecke, S., & Blum, M. (2018). Discourses across scales on forest landscape restoration. Sustainability, 10(3), 613.


Serebrjakov, I. (1964). Jekologicheskaja morfologija rastenij. Zhiznennye formy pokrytosemennyh i hvojnyh [Ecological morphology of plants. Life forms of higher plants and their study]. Vysshaja Shkola, Мoscow (in Russian).


Stanturf, J., Palik, B., Williams, M., Dumroese, R., & Madsen, P. (2014). Forest restoration paradigms. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 33(1), 161–194.


Vasilevich, V. (1969). Statisticheskie metody v geobotanike [Statistical methods in geobotany]. Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian).

Published
2018-11-19
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.