Ecological differentiation of Viburnum species according to their resistance to hydrothermal stress using water regime indicators
Abstract
Intensified aridization of climate and increase in the frequency of extreme weather events actualize the problem of studying the adaptive strategies of introduced woody plants to ensure stability of the cultivated phytocenoses . The paper presents a co m parative analysis of the physiological stability of 12 taxa of the Viburnum L. genus in the conditions of the Steppe Dnipro region during the growing season with the contrast moisture regime. We established the main directions of phenotypic modifications contributing to realization of the adaptive potential of species in the drought conditions – increased signs of xeromorphism of the leaf morphostructure ( V. lantana , V. сarlesii , V. rhytidophyllum , V. × juddii ), physiological mechanisms of increase in water-holding capacity of the tissues ( V. trilobum , V. × bodnantense , V. prunifolium , V. opulus ) , and complex effect of these reactions ( V. plicatum , V. lentago , V. farreri , V. farreri ' fragrans ' ). Dynamics of the physiological state of plants was assessed based on the monitoring of the set of water regime parameters using the multivariate statistical analysis (hierarchical clustering with the Ward’s method). Results of the study demonstrate a clear differentiation of species according to strategies of their adaptation to hydrothermal stress. Analysis of dendrograms allowed us to identify four stable cluster groups maintaining structural integrity under conditions of moderate moisture and to find “free elements” characterized by chaotic physiological response. T he peak drought load in July was observed to destabiliz e the cluster structure, resulting in the separation of moderately resistant species (in particular, V. lantana ) from the formed groups. Based on the assessment of the stability of interspecific relationships, the taxa under study are differentiated into three categories: resistant, moderately resistant, and nonresistant. Regarding the formation of resistance, the determining role of ecological and geographical origin in this process was revealed: T axa of North American ( V. prunifolium , V. lentago ) and European origin, evolutionarily adapted to the continental climate, demonstrated the highest adaptive potential. By contrast, the representative s of the East Asian flora ( V. carlesii , V. farreri ), being the typical mesophytes of the monsoon climate, showed the lowest drought tolerance. Partial regrouping of the studied taxa under the influence of peak loads is a consequence of sufficiently long period of introduction of these species in the conditions of steppe zone , in the area with unst a ble moisture. As a result, morphophysiological features of the plants under study are transformed. The proposed methodological approach and established ecological differentiation of mesophytic species in the xerothermic conditions allow us to predict the success of introduction and scientifically justify the selection of a sustainable assortment of ornamental shrubs for regions with risky hydrothermal regime.References
Ackerly, D. D. (2004). Functional traits of chaparral shrubs in relation to seasonal water deficit and disturbance. Ecological Monographs, 74(1), 25–44.
Allakhverdiev, S. I., Kreslavski, V. D., Klimov, V. V., Los, D. A., Carpentier, R., & Mohanty, P. (2008). Heat stress: An overview of molecular responses in photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research, 98(1–3), 541–550.
Apel, K., & Hirt, H. (2004). Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55(1), 373–399.
Bai, T., Li, Z., Song, C., Song, S., Jiao, J., Liu, Y., Dong, Z., & Zheng, X. (2019). Contrasting drought tolerance in two apple cultivars associated with difference in leaf morphology and anatomy. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 10, 709–722.
Bhusal, N., Lee, M., Han, R., Han, A. R, & Kim, H. S. (2020). Responses to drought stress in Prunus sargentii and Larix kaempferi seedlings using morphological and physiological parameters. Forest Ecology and Management, 465, 118099.
Chartzoulakis, K., Patakas, A., Kofidis, G., Bosabalidis, A., & Nastou, A. (2002). Water stress affects leaf anatomy, gas exchange, water relations and growth of two avocado cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 95, 39–50.
Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2009). Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany, 103(4), 551–560.
Clausen, J., Keck, D. D., & Hiesey, W. M. (1940). Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, Washington.
Crispo, E., Dibattista, J., Correa, C., Thibert-Plante, X., McKellar, A., Schwartz, A., Berner, D., De León, L., & Hendry, A. (2009). The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in response to anthropogenic disturbance. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 12, 47–66.
De la Sota, C., Ruffato-Ferreira, V. J., Ruiz-García, L., & Alvarez, S. (2019). Urban green infrastructure as a strategy of climate change mitigation: A case study in northern Spain. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 40, 145–151.
Demchenko, O. O. (2005). Systematyka ta filohenetychni zviazky vydiv rodu Viburnum L. [Systematics and phylogenetic relationships of species of the genus Viburnum L.]. Plant Introduction, 2, 27–33 (in Ukrainian).
Didukh, Y. P., Chornei, I. I., Budzhak, V. V., Tokariuk, A. I., Kish, R. Y., Protopopova, V. V., Shevera, M. V., Kozak, O. M., Kontar, I. S., Rozenblit, Y. V., & Norenko, K. M. (2016). Klimatohenni zminy roslynnoho svitu Ukrainskykh Karpat [Climatogenic changes of plant life of the Ukrainian Carpathians]. Drukart, Chernivtsi (in Ukrainian).
Donoghue, M. J., Baldwin, B. G., Li, J., & Winkworth, R. C. (2004). Viburnum phylogeny based on chloroplast trnK intron and nuclear ribosomal ITS DNA sequences. Systematic Botany, 29(1), 188–198.
Egolf, D. R. (1962). A cytological study of the genus Viburnum. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 43(2), 132–172.
Gaspar, M. J., Velasco, T., Feito, I., Alía, R., & Majada, J. (2013). Genetic variation of drought tolerance in Pinus pinaster at three hierarchical levels: A comparison of induced osmotic stress and field testing. PLoS One, 8(11), e79094.
Ghalambor, C. K., McKay, J. K., Carroll, S. P., & Reznick, D. N. (2007). Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Functional Ecology, 21(3), 394–407.
Holikova, М., & Zaitseva, І. (2009). Ctrukturno-funktsionalni osoblyvosti adaptatsii vydiv rodu Acer v umovakh stepovoho Prydniprovia [Structural and functional features of adaptation of species of the genus Acer in the conditions of the Steppe Dnieper region]. Biosystems Diversity, 17, 30–36 (in Ukrainian).
Horielov, O. M. (2016). Porivnialna otsinka posukhostiikosti verb z kolektsii Natsionalnoho botanichnoho sadu imeni M. M. Hryshka [Comparative assessment of drought resistance of willows from the collection of the M. M. Hryshko National Botanical Garden]. Plant Introduction, 2, 25–34 (in Ukrainian).
Hughes, J., Hepworth, C., Dutton, C., Dunn, J.A., Hunt, L., Stephens, J., Waugh, R., Cameron, D.D., & Gray, J. E. (2017). Reducing stomatal density in barley improves drought tolerance without impacting on yield. Plant Physiology, 174(2), 776–787.
Ivanko, I. A., Baranovskyi, B. O., Kabar, A. M., Karmyzova, L. O., Nikolaieva, V. V., Zhykharieva, A. V., Kulik, A. F., Dovhanenko, D. O., & Karas, L. M. (2025). Dendrolohichne riznomanittia ta suchasnyi stan zelenykh nasadzhen Dniprovskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Olesia Honchara [Dendrological diversity and current state of green plantings of Oles Honchar Dnipro National University]. Ecology and Noospherology, 36(1), 12–21 (in Ukrainian).
Jafari, S., Hashemi Garmdareh, S. E., & Azadegan, B. (2019). Effects of drought stress on morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of stock plant (Matthiola incana L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 253, 128–133.
Khaleghi, A., Naderi, R., Brunetti, C., Maserti, B. E., Salami, S. A., & Babalar, M. (2019). Morphological, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of Maclura pomifera to drought stress. Scientific Reports, 9, 19250.
Kokhno M. A., & Kurdiuk O. M. (1994). Teoretychni osnovy ta dosvid introduktsii derevnykh roslyn v Ukrayini [Theoretical foundations and experience of introducing woody plants in Ukraine]. Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
Kokhno, M. A., Trofymenko, N. M., Parkhomenko, L. I., Sobko, V. H., Horb, V. K., Klymenko, S. V., Hrevtsova, H. T., Halkin, S. I., Muzyka, H. I., Schepytska, T. S., Demchenko, O. O., Bilyk, O. V., Boniuk, Z. H., Balabushka, V. K., Halushko, R. V., Haponenko, M. B., Klymenko, Y. O., Kolesnychenko, O. M., Sydoruk, T. M., Kliuienko, O. V., Korniichuk, V. S., Strila, T. Y., Fedorovskyi, V. D., Yadrov, A. A., & Kurdiuk, O. M. (2005). Dendroflora Ukrayiny. Dykorosli i kultyvovani dereva i kuschi. Pokrytonasinni. Chastyna II. Dovidnyk [Dendroflora of Ukraine. Wild and cultivated trees and shrubs. Angiosperms. Part II. Guide]. Phytosociocenter, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
Kolodiazhenska, T. I. (2013). Porivnialna otsinka posukhostiikosti mezofanerofitiv rodu Juniperus L. v umovakh Lisostepu Ukrainy [Comparative assessment of drought tolerance of mesophanerophytes of the genus Juniperus L. in the conditions of the forest-steppe Ukraine]. Plant Introduction, 4, 92–97 (in Ukrainian).
Kordyum, E. L., & Dubyna, D. V. (2019). Phenotypic plasticity in plant adaptation and coexistence. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, 5(3), 8–13.
Kosakivska, I. V., Voitenko, L. V., Vasiuk, V. A., & Shcherbatiuk, M. M. (2023). Morfolohichni, fiziolohichni i molekuliarni skladovi adaptatsiynoyi vidpovidi predstavnykiv rodu Quercus (Fagaceae) na posukhu [Morphological, physiological, and molecular components of the adaptive response to drought in the genus Quercus (Fagaceae)]. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 80(3), 251–266 (in Ukrainian).
Leonov, O. Y. (2013). Hrupuvannia zrazkiv pshenytsi miakoyi za plastychnistiu ta stabilnistiu proiavu kilkisnykh oznak [Grouping of soft wheat samples by plasticity and stability of manifestation of quantitative traits]. Henetychni Resursy Roslyn, 13, 28–39 (in Ukrainian).
Leshcheniuk, О., & Chipilyak, Т. (2020). Morpho-anatomical adaptation of the leaves of certain Veronica species to arid conditions. Plant Introduction, 87–88, 47–53.
Manes, S., Costello, M. J., Beckett, H., Debnath, A., Devenish-Nelson, E., Grey, K.-A., Jenkins, R., Khan, T. M., Kiessling, W., Krause, C., Maharaj, S. S., Midgley, G. F., Price, J., Talukdar, G., & Vale, M. M. (2021). Endemism increases species’ climate change risk in areas of global biodiversity importance. Biological Conservation, 257, 109070.
Nejat, N., & Sadeghi, H. (2016). Finding out relationships among some morpho-biochemical parameters of Christ’s Thorn (Ziziphus spina-christi) under drought and salinity stresses. Planta Daninha, 34(4), 667–674.
Nicotra, A. B., Atkin, O. K., Bonser, S. P., Davidson, A. M., Finnegan, E. J., Mathesius, U., Poot, P., Purugganan, M. D., Richards, C. L., Valladares, F., & van Kleunen, M.. (2010). Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science, 15(12), 684–692.
Oishy, M. N., Shemonty, N. A., Fatema, S. I., Mahbub, S., Mim, E. L., Hasan Raisa, M. B., & Anik, A. H. (2025). Unravelling the effects of climate change on the soil-plant-atmosphere interactions: A critical review. Soil & Environmental Health, 3(1), 100130.
Ortiz, A. M. D., Outhwaite, C. L., Dalin, C., & Newbold, T. (2021). A review of the interactions between biodiversity, agriculture, climate change, and international trade: Research and policy priorities. One Earth, 4(1), 88–101.
Pereira, J., Cristina, E., Da Luz, L., Nogueira, R. J., Filho, P., Lima, L., & Santos, R. (2015). Cluster analysis to select peanut drought tolerance lines. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 9(11), 1095–1105.
Picotte, J. J., Rhode, J. M., & Cruzan, M. B. (2008). Leaf morphological responses to variation in water availability for plants in the Piriqueta caroliniana complex. Plant Ecology, 200, 267–275.
Pokhrel, S., Subedi, C., Thakuri, S., Kunwar, R., Sharma, K., Chaudhary, R., & Ghimire, S. K. (2025). Evaluating the ecological vulnerability and adaptive capacity of forest vegetation under climate stress across Nepal's mountain landscapes. Geocarto International, 40(1), 2551806.
Rana, P., & Varshney, L. R. (2023). Exploring limits to tree planting as a natural climate solution. Journal of Cleaner Production, 384, 135566.
Rennenberg, H., Loreto, F., Polle, A., Brilli, F., Fares, S., Beniwal, R. S., & Gessler, A. (2006). Physiological responses of forest trees to heat and drought. Plant Biology, 8(5), 556–571.
Rueda, M., Godoy, O., & Hawkins, B. A. (2017). Spatial and evolutionary parallelism between shade and drought tolerance explains the distributions of conifers in the conterminous United States. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26(1), 31–42.
Seneviratne, S. I. (2021). Chapter 11: Weather and climate extreme events in a changing climate. In: Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. (Eds.). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
Slishchuk, H., & Volkova, N. (2025). Dyferentsiyna ekspresiya heniv proteyiniv teplovoho shoku u nutu (Cicer arietinum L.) pry vidpovidi na posukhu [Differential expression of heat shock protein genes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in response to drought]. Faktory Eksperymentalnoyi Evoliutsiyi Orhanizmiv Factors of Experimental Evolution of Organisms, 36, 142–147 (in Ukrainian).
Szabados, L., & Savouré, A. (2010). Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends in Plant Science, 15(2), 89–97.
Tarasov, V. V. (2012). Flora Dnipropetrovskoi ta Zaporizkoi oblastei [Flora of Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhia regions]. Lira, Dnipro (in Ukrainian).
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2016, 181(1), 1–20.
Toscano, S., Ferrante, A., Romano, D., & Tribulato, A. (2021). Interactive effects of drought and saline aerosol stress on morphological and physiological characteristics of two ornamental shrub species. Horticulturae, 7(12), 517.
Vale, M. M., Arias, P. A., Ortega, G., Cardoso, M., Oliveira, B. F., Loyola, R., & Scarano, F. R. (2021). Climate change and biodiversity in the Atlantic Forest: Best climatic models, predicted changes and impacts, and adaptation options the Atlantic forest. In: Marques, M. C. M., & Grelle, C. E. V. (Eds.). The Atlantic forest. Springer, Cham. Pp. 253–267.
Valladares, F., Matesanz, S., Guilhaumon, F., Araujo, M. B., Balaguer, L., Benito-Garzon, M., Cornwell, W., Gianoli, E., van Kleunen, M., Naya, D. E., Nicotra, A. B., Poorter, H., & Zavala, M. A. (2014). The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. Ecology Letters, 17(11), 1351–1364.
Wang, F., Harindintwali, J. D., Wei, K., Shan, Y., Mi, Z., Costello, M. J., Grunwald, S., Feng, Z., Wang, F., Guo, Y., Wu, X., Kumar, P., Kastner, M., Feng, X., Kang, S., Liu, Z., Fu, Y., Zhao, W., Ouyang, C., & Tiedje, J. M. (2023). Climate change: strategies for mitigation and adaptation. Innovation Geoscience, 1(1), 100015.
Wang, W., Vinocur, B., Shoseyov, O., & Altman, A. (2004). Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends in Plant Science, 9(5), 244–252.
Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244.
Weed, A. S., Ayres, M. P., & Hicke, J. A. (2013). Consequences of climate change for biotic disturbances in North American forests. Ecological Monographs, 83(4), 441–470.
Yang, X., Lu, M., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., & Chen, S. (2021). Response mechanism of plants to drought stress. Horticulturae, 7(3), 50.
Yang, Z., Zhou, B., Chen, Q., Ge, X., & Shi, Y. (2018). Effects of drought on root architecture and non-structural carbohydrate of Cunninghamia lanceolata. Plants, 38, 6729–6740.
Zaitseva, I. O. (2017). Kilkisna otsinka posukhostiikosti introdutsentiv rodu Syringa L. v umovakh Stepovoho Prydniprovia [Quantitative assessment of drought tolerance of introduced species of the genus Syringa L. in the conditions of the Steppe Dnieper Region]. Pytannia Stepovoho Lisoznavstva ta Lisovoyi Rekultyvatsiyi Zemel’, 46, 76–81 (in Ukrainian).
Zaitseva, I. O. (2018). Vidnosna kil’kist’ prodykhiv yak pokaznyk stiykosti introdutsentiv rodu Syringa L. u stepoviy zoni [Relative number of stomata as an indicator of the resistance of introduced species of the genus Syringa L. in the steppe zone]. Naukovi Zapysky Ternopil’s’koho Natsional’noho Pedahohichnoho Universytetu, Seriya Biolohiya, 73, 17–21 (in Ukrainian).
Zandalinas, S. I., Mittler, R., Balfagón, D., Arbona, V., & Gómez-Cadenas, A. (2018). Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and high temperatures. Physiologia Plantarum, 162(1), 2–12.
Zepner, L., Karrasch, P., Wiemann, F., & Bernard, L. (2021). ClimateCharts.net – an interactive climate analysis web platform. International Journal of Digital Earth, 14(3), 338–356.
Zhang, C., Yang, H., Wu, W., & Li, W. (2017). Effect of drought stress on physiological changes and leaf surface morphology in the blackberry. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 40, 625–634.
Zia, R., Nawaz, M. S., Siddique, M. J., Hakim, S., & Imran, A. (2021). Plant survival under drought stress: Implications, adaptive responses, and integrated rhizosphere management strategy for stress mitigation. Microbiological Research, 242, 126626.



