Eсomorphic structure of the soil macrofauna communities of technosols of the Nikopol Manganese Ore Basin


  • K. P. Maslikova Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University
Keywords: ecomorphs; soil macrofauna; technosols; indication; reclamation

Abstract

This study established features of the animal population of artificial soil-like bodies – technosols in terms of ecomorphic analysis. The survey was conducted at the research station of the Dnipro State Agricultural University in the city Pokrov in 2012–2014. The experimental polygons were laid within four technosol types: pedozems, sod loess-like lithogenic soils on loam, grey-green clay and red-brown clay. The polygon consisted of 15 transects and each transect was composed of seven test sites. The distance between rows in the polygon was 3 m. Each test site was a square with size 3 × 3 m. The manual sorting of the soil-zoological samples was conducted within each site for areas 0.25 × 0.25 m to the depth where animals were found. Samples were taken in late April or early May. In general, for each period of counting for each polygon 105 soil-zoological samples were taken 123 species of invertebrates were found in the soil macrofauna community of the technosols. These communities are a steppe monoceonosis with a tendency to transformations into pseudoomonoceonosis on account of increased share of pratants. The soil macrofauna of sod lithogenic soils on grey-green clay and loam on loes-like clays is most adapted to xerophilous condition. Animal communities in pedozems and sod-lithogenic soils or on red-brown clay have a more mesophilic character. The trophoceonomorphic structure of the soil macrofauna community indicates a significant potential of the fertility of artificial soil. The aeromorphs’ structure reveals a significant ability of technosols to create cracks and pores, which can lead to hyperaeration. The dominant part of the of soil macrofauna community was hypercarbonatophils. Against the background of the steppe character, the soil macrofauna community had a topomorphic structure that is unusual for natural steppe black soil biogeocenoses on loess-like loam. The trophomorph structure was greatly dominated by phytophages, which indicates the prevalence of processes of mineralization of plant residues under the humification process. The phoromorphic spectrum of soil animal communities was dominated by ecological groups which move without the active construction of tunnels.

References

Akimov, M. P. (1954). Biomorphological method of studying of biocoenosis. Bulletin of Naturalists Society, 59(3), 27–36.


Andrusevich, K. V., Zhukov, A. V., & Kunah, O. N. (2014). Ecomorphic organisation of the mesopedobionts community as the basis of the anthropogenic soils zoological diagnostic. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 22, 89–97.


Barois, I., Villemin, G., Lavelle, P., & Toutain, F. (1993). Transformation of the soil structure through Pontoscolex corethrurus (Oligochaeta) intestinal tract. Geoderma, 56, 57–66.


Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2016). Effect of canopy density on litter invertebrate community structure in pine forests. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35(1), 90–102.


Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2016). Influence of litter thickness on the structure of litter macrofauna of deciduous forests of Ukraine’s steppe zone. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, Ecology, 24(1), 240–248.


Decaëns, T., & Rossi, J. P. (2001). Spatio-temporal structure of earthworm community and soil heterogeneity in a tropical pasture. Ecography, 24(6), 671–682.


Decaëns, T., Jiménez, J. J., Gioia, C., Measey, G. J., & Lavelle, P. (2006). The values of soil animals for conservation biology. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42(1), S23–S38.


Didukh, Y. P. (2011). The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication. Phytosociocentre, Kyiv.


Drake, J. A. (1990). Communities as assembled structures: Do rules govern pattern? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 159–164.


Faly, L. I., Kolombar, T. M., Prokopenko, E. V., Pakhomov, O. Y., & Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2017). Structure of litter macrofauna communities in poplar plantations in an urban ecosystem in Ukraine. Biosystems Diversity, 25(1), 29–38.


Gilarov, M. S. (1965). Zoological methods of the soils diagnostic. Nauka, Moscow.


Gongalsky, K. B., Gorshkova, I. A., Karpov, A. I., & Pokarzhevskii, A. D. (2008). Do boundaries of soil animal and plant communities coincide? A case study of a Mediterranean forest in Russia. European Journal of Soil Biology, 44(4), 355–363.


Gongalsky, K. B., Zaytsev, A. S., & Savin, F. A. (2009). Spatial distribution of soil animals: A geostatistical approach. Biology Bulletin Reviews, 70(6), 484–494.


Jiménez, J. J., Decaëns, T., Lavelle, P., & Rossi, J.-P. (2014). Dissecting the multi-scale spatial relationship of earthworm assemblages with soil environmental variability. BMC Ecology, 14–26.


Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., & Shachak, M. (1994). Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos, 69, 373–386.


Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., & Shachak, M. (1997). Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology, 78(7), 1946–1957.


Kharytonov, M., Babenko, M., Velychko, O., & Pardini, G. (2018). Prospects of medicinal herbs management in reclaimed minelands of Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8(1), 527–532.


Krivolutsky, D. A. (1994). Soil fauna in ecological control. Nauka, Moscow.


Kunah, O. N. (2016). Functional and spatial structure of the urbotechnozem mesopedobiont community. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, Ecology, 24(2), 473–483.


Kunah, O. N., Prokopenko, E. V., & Zhukov, A. V. (2014). Ecomorphic organisation of the Ukraine steppe zone spider community. Gruntoznavstvo, 15, 101–119.


Lavelle, P., Bignell, D., Lepage, M., Wolters, V., Roger, P., Ineson, P., Heal, O. W., & Dhillion, S. (1997). Soil function in a changing world: The role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers. European Journal of Soil Biology, 33, 159–193.


Mordkovich, V. G. (1977). Zoological diagnostics of the soil in forest-steppe and steppe zones of the Sibiria. Nauka, Novosibirsk.


Mordkovich, V. G. (2013). Zoological diagnostic of the soils: Imperatives, function and place in the soil science and pedology. Journal of General Biology, 74(6), 463–471.


Rossi, J. P. (2003). Clusters in earthworm spatial distribution. Pedobiologia, 47, 490–496.


Svyrydchenko, A. O., & Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2014). Trophic preferences of Rossiulus kessleri (Diplopoda, Julidae) for the litter of various tree species. Folia Oecologica, 41(2), 202–212.


Whalen, J. K. (2004). Spatial and temporal distribution of earthworm patches in corn field, hayfield and forest systems of southwestern Quebec, Canada. Applied Soil Ecology, 27(2), 143–151.


Williams, V. R. (1947). Pedology. Selhozgiz, Moscow.


Zhukov O. V., Zadorozhna, G. O., Maslikova, K. P., Andrusevych, K. V., & Lyadskaya, I. V. (2017). Tehnosoils ecology. Zhurfond, Dnipro.


Zhukov, A. V. (2015). Phytoindicator estimation of the multidimensional scaling of the plant community structure. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 1(1), 69–93.


Zhukov, A. V., & Shatalin, D. B. (2016). Hygrotope and trophotope of the steppe pridniprovie biogeoceonosis as determinants of the earthworms (Lumbricidae) communities β-diversity. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), 129–157.


Zhukov, A. V., & Zadorozhnaya, G. A. (2016). Spatio-temporal dynamics of the penetration resistance of recultivated soils formed after open cast mining. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, Ecology, 24(2), 324–331.


Zhukov, A. V., Kunah, O. N., Novikova, V. A., & Ganzha, D. S. (2016). Phytoindication estimation of soil mesopedobionts communities catena and their ecomorphic organization. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6(3), 91–117.


Zhukov, O. V. (2009). Ecomorphological analysis of soil animal consortia. Svidler, Dnepropetrovsk.


Zhukov, O. V., Kunah, O. M., & Dubinina, Y. Y. (2017). Sensitivity and resistance of communities: Evaluation on the example of the influence of edaphic, vegetation and spatial factors on soil macrofauna. Biosystems Diversity, 25(4), 328–341.


Zhukov, O. V., Kunah, O. N., & Novikova, V. A. (2016). The functional organisation of the mesopedobionts community of sod pinewood soils on arena of the river Dnepr. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, Ecology, 24(1), 26–39.


Zverkovskyi, V. M., Sytnyk, S. A., Lovynska, V. M., Kharytonov, M. M., & Mykolenko, S. Y. (2017). Remediation potential of forest-forming species in the reclamation planting. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 7(3), 64–72.

Published
2018-04-11
Section
Articles