The effect of vortex structures in the river bed on the concentration and size differentiation of the fish population


Keywords: hydroacoustic survey; fish behaviour; concentrations of fish; defensive behaviour; size differentiation of fish; turbulence

Abstract

On the basis of recent hydroacoustic method with using “PanCor” computerized program-technological complex, research was conducted on the distribution of fish of different taxonomic groups in the water area of Irtysh, a large trans-border river on the bend (meander) with a vortex zone. A hydroacoustic complex allows one to conduct remote size-taxonomic identification of fish. It is demonstrated that on the examined area of the river, fish of different taxonomic groups and sizes concentrate in the zones of increased turbidity and intense whirlpools (vortices) which form as a result of opposite currents at the river meander. The largest concentrations of fish form in the deepest zone of the examined water area and in front of it – vortex zone. It was determined that in the zone of recorded vortices, the number of fish of different taxonomic groups (Cyprinidae, Percidae, Coregonidae, Esocidae, Acipenseridae, Lotidae) is on average 2.14–2.61 times reliably higher compared to the observations at the studied part of the river with no vortices at comparable parameters of depth. The size structure of the fish was dominated by small individuals (<10 cm) in the vortices, and large fish out of these zones, which can be an additional element of the survival strategy. The peculiarities of the studied area of the river with vortices, on one hand, are the factors of formation of fish concentrations, and on the other hand – factors of differentiation by taxonomical and size parameter, related to inability of certain groups of organisms to resist the hydrodynamic force of the vortex structure.

References

Altenritter, M. E., Wieten, A. C., Ruetz, C. R., & Smith, K. M. (2013). Seasonal spatial distribution of juvenile lake sturgeon in Muskegon Lake, Michigan, USA. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 22, 467–478.


Andersen, M., Jacobsen, L., Grønkjær, P., & Skov, C. (2008). Turbidity increases behavioural diversity in northern pike, Esox lucius L., during early summer. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 15, 377–383.


Baryshnikov, N. B. (2007). Dinamika ruslovykh potokov [Dynamics of channel flows]. RGGMU, St. Petersburg (in Russian).


Blanckaert, K., Kleinhans, M. G., McLelland, S. J., Uijttewaal, W. S. J., Murphy, B. J., van de Kruijs, A., Parsons, D. R., & Chen, Q. (2013). Flow separation at the inner (convex) and outer (concave) banks of constant-width and widening open-channel bends. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38, 696–716.


Borisenko, E. S., Degtev, A. I., Mochek, A. D., & Pavlov, D. S. (2006). Hydroacoustic characteristics of mass fishes of the Ob-Irtysh Basin are investigated. Journal of Ichthyology, 46(2), 227–234.


Carton, A. G. (2005). The impact of light intensity and algal-induced turbidity on first-feeding Seriola lalandi larvae. Aquaculture Researches, 36, 1588–1594.


Davis, A. M., & Pusey, B. J. (2010). Trophic polymorphism and water clarity in Northern Australian Scortum (Pisces: Terapontidae). Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 19, 638–643.



Einfalt, L. M., & Wahl, D. H. (1997). Prey selection by juvenile walleye as influenced by prey morphology and behavior. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54, 2618–2626.


Figueiredo, B. R. S., Mormul, R. P., Chapman, B. B., Lolis, L. A., Fiori, L. F., & Benedito, E. (2016). Turbidity amplifies the non-lethal effects of predation and affects the foraging success of characid fish shoals. Freshwater Biology, 61, 293–300.


Garner, P. (1999). Swimming ability and differential use of velocity patches by 0+ cyprinids. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 8, 55–58.


Hansen, A. G., & Beauchamp, D. A. (2015). Latitudinal and photic effects on diel foraging and predation risk in freshwater pelagic ecosystems. Journal of Animal Ecology, 84, 532–544.


Harden-Jones, F. R. (1968). Fish migration. Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd., London.


Hazelton, P. D., & Grossman, G. D. (2009). Turbidity, velocity and interspecific interactions affect foraging behaviour of rosyside dace (Clinostomus funduloides) and yellowfin shiners (Notropis lutippinis). Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 18, 427–436.


Höjesjö, J., Gunve, E., Bohlin, T., & Johnsson, J. I. (2015). Addition of structural complexity – contrasting effect on juvenile brown trout in a natural stream. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 24, 608–615.


Jacobsen, L., Berg, S., Baktoft, H., & Skov, C. (2015). Behavioural strategy of large perch Perca fluviatilis varies between a mesotrophic and a hypereutrophic lake. Journal of Fish Biology, 86, 1016–1029.


Jacobsen, L., Berg, S., Jepsen, N., & Skov, C. (2004). Does roach behaviour differ between shallow lakes of different environmental state? Journal of Fish Biology, 65, 135–147.


Jepsen, N., Beck, S., Skov, C., & Koed, A. (2001). Behavior of pike (Esox lucius L.) >50 cm in a turbid reservoir and in a clearwater lake. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 10, 26–34.


Jönsson, M., Ranåker, L., Anders-Nilsson, P., & Brönmark, C. (2012). Prey-type-dependent foraging of young-of-the-year fish in turbid and humic environments. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 21, 461–468.


Knaepkens, G., Baekelandt, K., & Eens, M. (2006). Fish pass effectiveness for bullhead (Cottus gobio), perch (Perca fluviatilis) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) in a regulated lowland river. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 15, 20–29.


Linnansaari, T., Keskinen, A., Romakkaniemi, A., Erkinaro, J., & Orell, P. (2010). Deep habitats are important for juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. in large rivers. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 19, 618–626.


Ljunggren, L., & Sandström, A. (2007). Influence of visual conditions on foraging and growth of juvenile fishes with dissimilar sensory physiology. Journal of Fish Biology, 70, 1319–1334.


Lundvall, D., Svanbäck, R., Persson, L., & Byström, P. (1999). Size-dependent predation in piscivores: Interactions between predator foraging and prey avoidance abilities. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56, 1285–1292.


Mochek, A. D., Borisenko, E. S., Budaev, S. V., & Pavlov, D. S. (2015). Summer and autumn distribution of fish in lake Glubokoe. Journal of Ichthyology, 55(3), 355–362.


Muška, M., Tušer, M., Frouzová, J., Draštík, V., Čech, M., Jůza, T., Kratochvíl, M., Mrkvička, T., Peterka, J., Prchalová, M., Říha, M., Vašek, M., & Kubečka, J. (2013). To migrate, or not to migrate: Partial diel horizontal migration of fish in a temperate freshwater reservoir. Hydrobiologia. 707, 17.


Nakayama, S., Doering-Arjes, P., Linzmaier, S., Briege, J., Klefoth, T., Pieterek, T., & Arlinghaus, R. (2018). Fine-scale movement ecology of a freshwater top predator, Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis), in response to the abiotic environment over the course of a year. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 1, 1–15.


Ohata, R., Masuda, R., & Yamashita, Y. (2011). Ontogeny of antipredator performance in hatchery-reared Japanese anchovy Engraulis japonicus larvae exposed to visual or tactile predators in relation to turbidity. Journal of Fish Biology, 79, 2007–2018.


Ovsyanik, M. V. (2016). Obrazovanie vodovorota, smercha [Formation of a vortex and a tornado]. Evraziyskiy Soyuz Uchenykh, 28, 78–84 (in Russian).


Pavlov, D. S. (1979). Biologicheskie osnovy upravleniya povedeniem ryb v potoke vody [The biological basis of the behavior of fish in the control of water flow]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).


Ranåker, L., Jönsson, M., Nilsson, P. A., & Brönmark, C. (2012). Effects of brown and turbid water on piscivore-prey fish interactions along a visibility gradient. Freshwater Biology, 57, 1761–1768.


Salonen, M., & Engström-Öst, J. (2010). Prey capture of pike Esox lucius larvae in turbid water. Journal of Fish Biology, 76, 2591–2596.


Skov, C., & Koed, A., (2004). Habitat use of 0+ year pike in experimental ponds in relation to cannibalism, zooplankton, water transparency and habitat complexity. Journal of Fish Biology, 64, 448–459.


Snickars, M., Sandström, A., & Mattila, J. (2004). Antipredator behaviour of 0+ year Perca fluviatilis: Effect of vegetation density and turbidity. Journal of Fish Biology, 65, 1604–1613.


Stoll, S., Fischer, P., Klahold, P., Scheifhacken, N., Hofmann, H., & Rothhaupt, K.-O. (2008). Effects of water depth and hydrodynamics on the growth and distribution of juvenile cyprinids in the littoral zone of a large pre-alpine lake. Journal of Fish Biology, 72, 1001–1022.


Turesson, H., Persson, A., & Brönmark, C. (2002). Prey size selection in piscivorous pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) includes active prey choice. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 11, 223–233.


Vanderpham, J. P., Nakagawa, S., & Closs, G. P. (2013). Feeding ability of a fluvial habitat-specialist and habitat-generalist fish in turbulent and still conditions. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 22, 596–606.


VanLandeghem, M. M., Carey, M. P., & Wahl, D. H. (2011). Turbidity-induced changes in emergent effects of multiple predators with different foraging strategies. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 20, 279–286.


Velikanov, M. A. (1958). Ruslovoy protsess: Osnovy teorii [Channel process: The basics of theory]. Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel'stvo Fiziko-Matematicheskoy Literatury, Moscow (in Russian).


Vermeulen, B., Hoitink, A. J. F., van Berkum, S. W., & Hidayat (2014). Sharp bends associated with deep scours in a tropical river: The river Mahakam (East Kalimantan, Indonesia). Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 119, 1441–1454.


Yudanov, K. I., Kalikhman, I. L., & Tesler, V. D. (1984). Rukovodstvo po provedeniyu gidroakusticheskikh s’emok [Guidelines for hydroacoustic surveys]. VNIRO, Moscow (in Russian).

Published
2018-05-10
Section
Articles