Diversity of diversity indices: Which diversity measure is better?

  • O. M. Kunakh Institute of Engineering Thermophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
  • A. M. Volkova Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
  • G. F. Tutova Bogdan Khmelnitsky Melitopol State Pedagogical University
  • O. V. Zhukov Bogdan Khmelnitsky Melitopol State Pedagogical University
Keywords: species richness; Shannon index; evolution; succession; urban park; recultivation; ecosystem comparison

Abstract

The article evaluates the dependence of the most common indices of species diversity on sample size and determines their ability to differentiate between different types of ecosystems, with a special emphasis on discriminating between natural and anthropogenic ecosystems. An approach to adjusting the indices to reduce their dependence on sample size was also proposed. The study was conducted in seven types of ecosystems: four were natural and three were anthropogenically transformed. Samples of soil animals were selected in 2011–2013 and 2021 using the same methods. A total of 20,518 soil animal specimens belonging to 202 species were collected in all study locations. The null alternative was generated by randomly selecting samples containing 2, 3, ..., 110 soil animals from the combined soil animal sample. For each gradation of sample size, 200 sample variants were formed. The density of soil macrofauna in natural ecosystems ranged from 3.6 ± 1.5 to 15.2 ± 6.9 specimens per sample, and in artificial ecosystems – from 13.2 ± 7.6 to 21.0 ± 11.9 specimens per sample. The number of species ranged from 22–80 species, and in artificial ecosystems it was 38–99 species. Indicators of species diversity correlated with each other. A high level of correlation was observed between indicators within groups of indices: indices of species richness and indices of heterogeneity and evenness. Fisher’s log-series alpha and the fundamental parameter of biodiversity were highly correlated with each other, as well as with the Margalef, species richness, and Chao’s species abundance indices. The log-normal distribution best describes the dominance patterns in terms of abundance in the natural ecosystems, and the Zipf-Mandelbrot distribution best describes the dominance patterns in terms of abundance in the artificial ecosystems. Diversity indices were ordered in the space of two dimensions, one explaining the variation between ecosystems and the other depending on sample size. The ordering of the traditional indices showed that there is a vacancy for the best index in the sense that such an index should best explain differences between ecosystems and differences between natural and artificial ecosystems. It should also be independent of sample size. The Simpson heterogeneity index and the Simpson evenness index were the best of the traditional indices, but they did not explain differences between ecosystems very well, especially when it came to distinguishing between natural and artificial ecosystems. The Margalef index, which is supposed to be independent of sample size, on the other hand, showed a very high level of dependence. Such a dependence was also found for the Menhinick index, though to a lesser extent. Obviously, size dependence negatively affects the differential ability of the indices. The corrected indices of species richness and the Shannon index are practically independent of sample size and have a greater ability to differentiate ecosystems by the level of diversity, with natural ecosystems characterized by consistently higher values of the corrected indices than artificial ecosystems. The dependence on the sample size makes indices from different ecosystems practically incomparable, which makes their use meaningless. Even minor differences in sample size can lead to significant deviations in the values of diversity indices. The application of the Michaelis-Menten model allowed us to suggest a method of correction of species richness indices and the Shannon index. After the correction, the indices are practically independent of the sample size, and their differential ability to characterize individual ecosystems and the level of anthropogenic transformation increases significantly.

References

Alonso, D., & McKane, A. J. (2004). Sampling Hubbell’s neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 7(10), 901–910.
Anderson, J., & Ingram, J. (1993). Tropical soil biology and fertility. A handbook of methods. CAB International, Wallingford.
Aubier, T. G. (2020). Positive density dependence acting on mortality can help maintain species-rich communities. ELife, 9, e.57788.
Bailey, R. I., Molleman, F., Vasseur, C., Woas, S., & Prinzing, A. (2018). Large body size constrains dispersal assembly of communities even across short distances. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 10911.
Barangé, M., & Campos, B. (1991). Models of species abundance: a critique of and an alternative to the dynamics model. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 69, 293–298.
Beck, J., & Schwanghart, W. (2010). Comparing measures of species diversity from incomplete inventories: An update. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(1), 38–44.
Berger, W. H., & Parker, F. L. (1970). Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science, 168(3937), 1345–1347.
Bonnaffé, W., Danet, A., Legendre, S., & Edeline, E. (2021). Comparison of size-structured and species‐level trophic networks reveals antagonistic effects of temperature on vertical trophic diversity at the population and species level. Oikos, 130(8), 1297–1309.
Brillouin, L. (1956). Science and information theory. Academic Press, New York.
Cazzolla Gatti, R., Amoroso, N., & Monaco, A. (2020). Estimating and comparing biodiversity with a single universal metric. Ecological Modelling, 424, 109020.
Ceia, F. R., Cherel, Y., Silva, A. V., Garrido, S., Angélico, M. M., da Silva, J. M., Laranjeiro, M. I., & Ramos, J. A. (2023). Drivers of niche partitioning in a community of mid-trophic level epipelagic species in the North Atlantic. Hydrobiologia, 850(7), 1583–1599.
Chao, A. (1982). Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 11(4), 265–270.
Chao, A. (1987). Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics, 43(4), 783–791.
Chao, A., & Jost, L. (2012). Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: Standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology, 93(12), 2533–2547.
Chao, A., & Jost, L. (2015). Estimating diversity and entropy profiles via discovery rates of new species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6(8), 873–882.
Chao, A., & Lee, S.-M. (1992). Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(417), 210–217.
Chave, J. (2004). Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecology Letters, 7(3), 241–253.
Chisholm, R. A., & Pacala, S. W. (2010). Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(36), 15821–15825.
Cohen, J. E., & Łuczak, T. (1992). Trophic levels in community food webs. Evolutionary Ecology, 6(1), 73–89.
Cramer, M. J., & Willig, M. R. (2005). Habitat heterogeneity, species diversity and null models. Oikos, 108(2), 209–218.
DeAngelis, D. L., & Waterhouse, J. C. (1987). Equilibrium and nonequilibrium concepts in ecological models. Ecological Monographs, 57(1), 1–21.
Diamond, J. (1988). Factors controlling species diversity: Overview and synthesis. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 75(1), 117–129.
Dietrich, P., Cesarz, S., Liu, T., Roscher, C., & Eisenhauer, N. (2021). Effects of plant species diversity on nematode community composition and diversity in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Oecologia, 197(2), 297–311.
Doncaster, C. P. (2009). Ecological equivalence: A realistic assumption for niche theory as a testable alternative to neutral theory. PLoS One, 4(10), e7460.
Elo, M., Alahuhta, J., Kanninen, A., Meissner, K. K., Seppälä, K., & Mönkkönen, M. (2018). Environmental characteristics and anthropogenic impact jointly modify aquatic macrophyte species diversity. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1001.
Etienne, R. S., Apol, M. E. F., Olff, H., & Weissing, F. J. (2007). Modes of speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity. Oikos, 116(2), 241–258.
Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S., & Williams, C. B. (1943). The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 12(1), 42–58.
Frank, S. A. (2019). The common patterns of abundance: The log series and Zipf’s law. F1000Research, 8, 334.
Frerebeau, N. (2019). Tabula: An R package for analysis, seriation, and visualization of archaeological count data. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(44), 1821.
Frontier, S. (1985). Diversity and structure in aquatic ecosystems. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 23, 253–312.
Gamito, S. (2010). Caution is needed when applying Margalef diversity index. Ecological Indicators, 10(2), 550–551.
Gaston, K. J. (1996). The multiple forms of the interspecific abundance-distribution relationship. Oikos, 76(2), 211–220.
Gilbert, B., & Levine, J. M. (2017). Ecological drift and the distribution of species diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20170507.
Gini, C. (1912). Variabilità e mutabilità [Variability and mutability ]. In: Pizetti, E., & Salvemini, T. (Eds.). Memorie di metodologica statistica [Memoirs of statistical methodology]. Libreria Eredi Virgilio Veschi, Rome (in Italian).
Gotelli, N. J., & Colwell, R. K. (2011). Estimating species richness. In: Magurran, A. E., & McGill, B. J. (Eds.). Biological diversity: Frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Pp. 39–54.
Grabchak, M., Marcon, E., Lang, G., & Zhang, Z. (2017). The generalized Simpson’s entropy is a measure of biodiversity. PLoS One, 12(3), e0173305.
Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), 156–175.
Guiasu, R. C., & Guiasu, S. (2010). The Rich-Gini-Simpson quadratic index of biodiversity. Natural Science, 2(10), 1130–1137.
Guillera‐Arroita, G., Kéry, M., & Lahoz‐Monfort, J. J. (2019). Inferring species richness using multispecies occupancy modeling: Estimation performance and interpretation. Ecology and Evolution, 9(2), 780–792.
Haegeman, B., Hamelin, J., Moriarty, J., Neal, P., Dushoff, J., & Weitz, J. S. (2013). Robust estimation of microbial diversity in theory and in practice. The Microbial Population and Community Ecology, 7(6), 1092–1101.
Hankin, R. K. S. (2007). Introducing untb, an R package for simulating ecological drift under the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Journal of Statistical Software, 22(12), 1–15.
He, F., & Hu, X. S. (2005). Hubbell’s fundamental biodiversity parameter and the Simpson diversity index. Ecology Letters, 8(4), 386–390.
Hill, M. O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54(2), 427–432.
Hubbell, S. (2001). A unified theory of biodiversity and biogeography. не хватает данных
Hubbell, S. P. (2001). The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press. не хватает данных
Hurlbert, S. H. (1971). The nonconcept of species diversity: A critique and alternative parameters. Ecology, 52(4), 577–586.
Huston, M. (1979). A general hypothesis of species diversity. The American Naturalist, 113(1), 81–101.
Jost, L. (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos, 113(2), 363–375.
Jost, L. (2010). The relation between evenness and diversity. Diversity, 2(2), 207–232.
Julliard, R., Clavel, J., Devictor, V., Jiguet, F., & Couvet, D. (2006). Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecology Letters, 9(11), 1237–1244.
Kempton, R. A. (1979). The structure of species abundance and measurement of diversity. Biometrics, 35(1), 307–321.
Kopp, M. (2010). Speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity. BioEssays, 32(7), 564–570.
Kovalenko, K. E., Thomaz, S. M., & Warfe, D. M. (2012). Habitat complexity: Approaches and future directions. Hydrobiologia, 685(1), 1–17.
Laan, A., & de Polavieja, G. G. (2018). Species diversity rises exponentially with the number of available resources in a multi-trait competition model. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285, 20181273.
Lande, R., DeVries, P. J., & Walla, T. R. (2000). When species accumulation curves intersect: Implications for ranking diversity using small samples. Oikos, 89(3), 601–605.
Lawton, J. H. (1999). Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos, 84(2), 177–192.
Lu, H.-P., Yeh, Y.-C., Shiah, F.-K., Gong, G.-C., & Hsieh, C. (2019). Evolutionary constraints on species diversity in marine bacterioplankton communities. Microbial Population and Community Ecology, 13(4), 1032–1041.
Ma, M. (2005). Species richness vs evenness: Independent relationship and different responses to edaphic factors. Oikos, 111(1), 192–198.
Magurran, A. E. (2004). Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford.
Magurran, A. E., & McGill, B. J. (2011). Biological diversity: Frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mandelbrot, B. B. (1977). Fractals: Form, chance and dimension. W. H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco.
Margalef, R. (1958). Information theory in ecology. General Systems, 3, 36–71.
Matthews, T. J., & Whittaker, R. J. (2015). On the species abundance distribution in applied ecology and biodiversity management. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(2), 443–454.
McIntosh, R. P. (1967). An index of diversity and the relation of certain concepts to diversity. Ecology, 48(3), 392–404.
Menhinick, E. F. (1964). A comparison of some species-individuals diversity indices applied to samples of field insects. Ecology, 45(4), 859–861.
Merino, N., Aronson, H. S., Bojanova, D. P., Feyhl-Buska, J., Wong, M. L., Zhang, S., & Giovannelli, D. (2019). Living at the extremes: Extremophiles and the limits of life in a planetary context. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 780.
Milanesi, P., Della Rocca, F., & Robinson, R. A. (2020). Integrating dynamic environmental predictors and species occurrences: Toward true dynamic species distribution models. Ecology and Evolution, 10(2), 1087–1092.
Missa, O., Dytham, C., & Morlon, H. (2016). Understanding how biodiversity unfolds through time under neutral theory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150226.
Motomura, I. (1932). On the statistical treatment of communities. Zoological Magazine, 44, 379–383.
Nijs, I., & Roy, J. (2000). How important are species richness, species evenness and interspecific differences to productivity? A mathematical model. Oikos, 88(1), 57–66.
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., & Wagner, H. (2019). vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-6.
Palmer, M. W. (1994). Variation in species richness: Towards a unification of hypotheses. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica, 29(4), 511–530.
Petraitis, P. S., Latham, R. E., & Niesenbaum, R. A. (1989). The maintenance of species diversity by disturbance. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 64(4), 393–418.
Pielou, E. (1969). An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York.
Pielou, E. C. (1975). Ecological diversity. John Wiley & Sons, New York..
Preston, F. W. (1948). The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology, 29(3), 254–283.
Roswell, M., Dushoff, J., & Winfree, R. (2021). A conceptual guide to measuring species diversity. Oikos, 130(3), 321–338.
Rybicki, J., Abrego, N., & Ovaskainen, O. (2020). Habitat fragmentation and species diversity in competitive communities. Ecology Letters, 23(3), 506–517.
Sanders, H. L. (1968). Marine benthic diversity: A comparative study. The American Naturalist, 102(925), 243–282.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163(4148), 688.
Soetaert, K., & Heip, C. (1990). Sample-size dependence of diversity indices and the determination of sufficient sample size in a high-diversity deep-sea environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 59, 305–307.
Southwood, T. R. E. (1977). Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? The Journal of Animal Ecology, 46(2), 336–365.
Spatharis, S., & Tsirtsis, G. (2013). Zipf–Mandelbrot model behavior in marine eutrophication: Two way fitting on field and simulated phytoplankton assemblages. Hydrobiologia, 714(1), 191–199.
Staudhammer, C. L., Escobedo, F. J., & Blood, A. (2018). Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources: The case of urban and peri‐urban forests. Ecosphere, 9(10), e02450.
Stein, A., Gerstner, K., & Kreft, H. (2014). Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecology Letters, 17(7), 866–880.
Stier, A. C., Bolker, B. M., & Osenberg, C. W. (2016). Using rarefaction to isolate the effects of patch size and sampling effort on beta diversity. Ecosphere, 7(12), e01612.
Stirling, G., & Wilsey, B. (2001). Empirical relationships between species richness, evenness, and proportional diversity. The American Naturalist, 158(3), 286–299.
Thébault, E., & Loreau, M. (2005). Trophic interactions and the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem stability. The American Naturalist, 166(4), E95–E114.
Thomas, W. R., & Foin, T. C. (1982). Neutral hypotheses and patterns of species diversity: fact or artifact? Paleobiology, 8(1), 45–55.
Tuomisto, H. (2010a). A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Yes, it does exist. Oecologia, 164(4), 853–860.
Tuomisto, H. (2010b). A diversity of beta diversities: Straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 2. Quantifying beta diversity and related phenomena. Ecography, 33(1), 23–45.
Tutova, G. F., Zhukov, O. V., Kunakh, O. M., & Zhukova, Y. O. (2022). Response of earthworms to changes in the aggregate structure of floodplain soils. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1049(1), 012062.
Urban, M. C., Strauss, S. Y., Pelletier, F., Palkovacs, E. P., Leibold, M. A., Hendry, A. P., De Meester, L., Carlson, S. M., Angert, A. L., & Giery, S. T. (2020). Evolutionary origins for ecological patterns in space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(30), 17482–17490.
van Loon, W. M. G. M., Walvoort, D. J. J., van Hoey, G., Vina-Herbon, C., Blandon, A., Pesch, R., Schmitt, P., Scholle, J., Heyer, K., Lavaleye, M., Phillips, G., Duineveld, G. C. A., & Blomqvist, M. (2018). A regional benthic fauna assessment method for the Southern North Sea using Margalef diversity and reference value modelling. Ecological Indicators, 89, 667–679.
Waldock, C., Stuart‐Smith, R. D., Albouy, C., Cheung, W. W. L., Edgar, G. J., Mouillot, D., Tjiputra, J., & Pellissier, L. (2022). A quantitative review of abundance‐based species distribution models. Ecography, 2022(1), e05694.
Whittaker, R. H. (1965). Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science, 147(3655), 250–260.
Whittaker, R. H. (1972). Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21(2–3), 213–251.
Williamson, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2005). The lognormal distribution is not an appropriate null hypothesis for the species-abundance distribution. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74(3), 409–422.
Willis, A. D. (2019). Rarefaction, alpha diversity, and statistics. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 2407.
Wilson, J. B., Sykes, M. T., & Peet, R. K. (1995). Time and space in the community structure of a species-rich limestone grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science, 6(5), 729–740.
Yakovenko, V., & Zhukov, O. (2021). Zoogenic structure aggregation in steppe and forest soils. In: Dmytruk, Y., & Dent, D. (Eds.). Soils under stress. Springer International Publishing. Pp. 111–127.
Zang, Z., Zeng, Y., Wang, D., Shi, F., Dong, Y., Liu, N., & Liang, Y. (2022). Species-abundance distribution patterns of plant communities in the Gurbantünggüt desert, China. Sustainability, 14(20), 12957.
Zhou, S., & Zhang, D. (2008). Neutral theory in community ecology. Frontiers of Biology in China, 3(1), 1–8.
Zhukov, A., & Gadorozhnaya, G. (2016). Spatial heterogeneity of mechanical impedance of a typical chernozem: The ecological approach. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35(3), 263–278.
Zhukov, O. V., Kunah, O. M., Dubinina, Y. Y., & Novikova, V. O. (2018). The role of edaphic, vegetational and spatial factors in structuring soil animal communities in a floodplain forest of the Dnipro river. Folia Oecologica, 45(1), 8–23.
Zhukov, O., Kunah, O., Fedushko, M., Babchenko, A., & Umerova, A. (2021). Temporal aspect of the terrestrial invertebrate response to moisture dynamic in technosols formed after reclamation at a post-mining site in Ukrainian steppe drylands. Ekológia (Bratislava), 40(2), 178–188.
Zhukov, O., Kunakh, O., Yorkina, N., & Tutova, A. (2023). Response of soil macrofauna to urban park reconstruction. Soil Ecology Letters, 5(2), 220156.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press, Inc., Cambridge.
Published
2023-05-02
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>