Spatial distribution of Corvidae in transformed landscapes of Zhytomyr region

  • A. V. Matsyura Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia
  • A. A. Zimaroyeva Zhytomyr National Agrotechnological University
Keywords: Corvidae, density, anthropogenic pressure, abundance, urbanization, Zhytomyr, Ukraine


The spatial distribution and abundance of Corvidae species was studied in Zhytomyr region with a focus on rural and urban differences in the studied parameters. We selected Rook (Corvus frugilegus L.), Western Jackdaw (C. monedula L.), Hooded Crow (C. cornix L.), Eurasian Magpie (Pica pica L.), Eurasian Jay (Garrulus glandarius L.), and Common Raven (Corvus corax L.). All observations were made during 2009–2012. During the study period some 38 survey paths of more than 8,000 km were surveyed in 21 settlements of Zhytomyr region, among them 13 were in Zhytomyr city. The aim of our study was to establish the number and density of Corvidae in different seasons in the settlements of Zhytomyr region along a rural-urban gradient. The average density of Rooks was 55.9 ind./km2. We also found a strong correlation between Rook density and the rural-urban gradient and observed that the number of Rooks wintering in cities significantly increased due to the influx from villages. The peak number of Rooks in villages was registered in the breeding and post-breeding season while in the cities it was high in winter and during the spring migration. The average density of Eurasian Magpie in the study area was 8.7 ind./km2 and had a weak correlation with the urban-rural gradient. The density of Eurasian Magpies in urban areas differs significantly only from the density of birds in villages with a population of ca. 1,000 people. The density of Magpies varied insignificantly within a narrow range during the three years of research, remaining relatively stable, which suggests that the species successfully adjusts to conditions in transformed landscapes. The urban-rural gradient significantly affects the density of Hooded Crows. The average density of birds in towns was 6.6 ind./km2. In breeding period the urban birds had a low density and rural crows, on the contrary, had a high density, the density of birds in the nesting period was greater than in autumn and winter, due to the distribution of birds in their breeding territories and the start of the reproductive cycle. The average density of Eurasian Jackdaw was 9.7 ind./km2 and the rural-urban gradient significantly affected the number of birds. For jackdaws we registered high annual population dynamics. The peak number of birds was observed in the winter period in cities and small towns while in villages it was registered in the breeding and post-breeding season. The average density of Eurasian Jay was 2.4 ind./km2 and varied significantly in different settlements, although the fluctuation range was small (0.1–9.3 ind./km2). The number of this species naturally decreases along the gradient of landscape transformation. The highest average density was typical in small villages (4.9 ind./km2) and the lowest was found in medium-sized cities (1.5 ind./km2). We have identified certain patterns in the seasonal dynamic of Eurasian Jays relative to the type of settlement. In urban areas the birds’ density was much higher in winter compared to the nesting period, and in villages we observed the reverse situation. The average density of Common Raven was 1.3 ind./km2. The highest density was registered in small villages and was 2.2 ind./km2, and the smallest in the villages of urban type (0.6 ind./km2). The urban-rural gradient significantly affected the spatial distribution of Common Raven, but we cannot state that this bird increased or decreased its number along the gradient of urbanization, since the value of this indicator also depended on habitat conditions in specific settlements. The spatial distribution of Common Ravens varied seasonally and the highest density was typical in winter due to food migrations to human settlements.


Andersen, L., Hoerschelmann, Н., 1996. Siedlungsdichte, Reviergrosse und Bruterfolg von Rabenkrahen (Corvus corone L.) in der Gross Stadlandschaft Hamburgs. Hamburg. Avifaun. Beitr. 28, 17-42.
Bar-Massada, A., Wood, E.M., Pidgeon, A.M., Radeloff, V.C., 2012. Complex effects of scale on the relationships of land-scape pattern versus avian species richness and community structure in a woodland savanna mosaic. Ecography 35, 393–411.
Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A., 1992. Bird census tech-niques. Academic Press, London.
Blair, R.B., Johnson, E.M., 2008. Suburban habitats and their role for birds in the urban–rural habitat network: Points of local invasion and extinction? Landscape Ecol. 23, 1157–1169.
Bobyliov, Y.P., Brygadyrenko, V.V., Bulakhov, V.L., Gaichenko, V.A., Gasso, V.Y., Didukh, Y.P., Ivashov, A.V., Kucheriavyi, V.P., Maliovanyi, M.S., Mytsyk, L.P., Pakhomov, O.Y., Tsaryk, I.V., Shabanov, D.A., 2014. Ekologija [Ecology]. Folio, Kharkiv (in Ukrainian).
Bokotey, A.A., 1993. Struktura metodychnyh pidhodiv do vyvchennja naselennja ptahiv urbolandshaftiv (na prykladi L’vova) [The structure and methods of urban bird research (the case of Lvov)]. IBA Program ‘Obliky ptahiv: Pidhody, metodyky, rezul’taty’. Kyiv, Lviv (in Ukrainian).
Bonier, F., Martin, P.R., Wingfield, J.C., 2007. Urban birds have broader environmental tolerance. Biol. Lett. 3, 670–673.
Boyko, A., Brygadyrenko, V., Shendryk, L., Loza, I., 2009. Estimation of the role of antropo-zoonosis invasion agents in the counteraction to bioterrorism. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology. Springer Science, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 309–315.
Catterall, C.P., 2009. Responses of faunal assemblages to urbanisation: Global research paradigms and an avian case study. In: McDonnell, M.J., Hahs, A.K., Brueste, J.H. (eds). Ecology of cities and towns: A comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, New York. 129–155.
Conole, L., Kirkpatrick, J.B., 2011. Functional and spatial differentiation of urban bird assemblages at the landscape scale. Landscape Urban Plan. 100, 11–23.
Croci, S., Butet, A., Clergeau, P., 2008. Does urbanization filter birds on the basis of their biological traits? Condor 110, 223–240.
Evans, K.L., Chamberlain, D.E., Hatchwell, B.J., Gregory, R.D., Gaston, K.J., 2010. What makes an urban bird? Glob. Change Biol. 17, 32–44.
Gavrilov, V.M., 2004. Sravnitel’naja jenergetika vorob’inyh i nevorob’inyh ptic: Predel’nye razmery, jenergeticheskaja moshhnost’, jekologicheskie sledstvija [Comparative energetics of Passeriformes and Non-Passeroformes: extremal dimensions, energetic power, ecological consequences]. Ornitologija 31, 92–107 (in Russian).
Gonzalez-Oreja, J.A., 2011. Birds of different biogeographic origins respond in contrasting ways to urbanization. Biol. Conserv. 144, 234–242.
Guziy, A.I., 1993. Metody ucheta ptyc v lesakh. In: Obliky ptahiv: Pidhody, metodiky, rezul’taty [Forest birds census methods – approaches, algorithms, results]. IBI Program, L’viv, Kyiv. 18–58 (in Russian).
Ilynskiy, S.V., 2008. Poshyrennja j biotopnyj rozpodil graka Corvus frugilegus L. i soroky Pica pica L. u misti Hmel’nyc’kyj (gnizdovyj period) [Biotope distribution of Rook and Eurasian Magpie in Chmelnitskiy during the breeding season]. Naukovyj Visnyk Uzhgorods’kogo Universytetu 23, 47–53 (in Ukrainian).
Ilynskiy, S.V., 2009. Poshyrennja i prostorovyj rozpodil poselen’ galky Corvus monedula u misti Hmel’nyc’kyj v gnizdovyj period [Biotope distribution of Eurasian Jay in Chmelnitskiy during the breeding season]. Biologija ta Valeologija 11, 36–41 (in Ukrainian).
Kark, S., Iwaniuk, A., Schalimtzek, A., Banker, E., 2007. Living in the city: Can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter’? J. Biogeogr. 34, 638–651.
Kath, J., Maron, M., Dunn, P.K., 2009. Interspecific competition and small bird diversity in an urbanizing landscape. Land-scape Urban Plan. 92, 72–79.
Konstantinov, V.M., Ponomarev, V.A., Voronov, L.N., Zorina, Z.A., Krasnobaev, D.A., 2007. Seraja vorona (Corvus cornix L.) v antropogennyh landshaftah Palearktiki (problemy sinantropizacii i urbanizacii) [Hooded Crow in anthropogenic landscape of Palearctic. Synantropization and urbanization problems]. MPGU, Moscow (in Russian).
Kunakh, O.N., Trifanova, M.V., Ganzha, D.S., 2014. Zoo- i phytoindicatciya roli avtotrophnoy i geterotrophnoy konsortciy v organizatciy biogeotcenoza [Zooindication and phytoindication of autotrophic and heterotrophic consortia of biogeocoenoses organization]. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University 4(2), 115–141 (in Russian).
Leveau, L.M., 2013. Bird traits in urban–rural gradients: How many functional groups are there? J. Ornithol. 154, 655–662.
Listopadsky, M.A., 2015. Istoriya ta suchasnyi stan lisosmug biosphernogo zapovidnyka ‘Askania Nova’ [History and present state of forest bells in the biosphere reserve ‘Askania Nova’]. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University 5(1), 156–210 (in Ukrainian).
Loginov, S.B., 2008. Chislennost’ i razmeshhenie vranovyh ptic v gorode Tveri [Corvidae abundance and distribution in Tver]. Vesnik Tverskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universituteta Serija Biologija 7, 89–95 (in Russian).
Luck, G.W., Smallbone, L.T., 2010. Species diversity and ur-banization: Patterns, drivers and implications. In: Gaston, K.J. (ed.). Urban ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Matsyura, A.V., 2015. Ispolzovanie dannykh mecheniya i povtornogo otlova dlia opredeleniya razmera populatciy [Population size estimation from the data of marked and capture-recapture methods]. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University 5(2), 85–92 (in Russian).
Matsyura, A., Jankowski, K., Zimaroeva, A., 2015a. Corvidae tolerance to human disturbance in settlement landscapes of Zhytomir (Ukraine). Romanian Journal of Biology-Zoology 60(1), 39–47.
Matsyura, A., Jankowski, K., Zimaroeva, A., 2015b. Escape behaviours of Corvidae in an urban ecosystem of Zhytomyr (Uk¬raine). Romanian Journal of Biology-Zoology, 60(2), in press.
McDonnell, M.J., Hahs, A.K., 2013. The future of urban biodiversity research: Moving beyond the low-hanging fruit. Urban Ecosyst. 16, 397–409.
McDonnell, M.J., Hahs, A.K., Pickett, S.T.A., 2012. Exposing an urban ecology straw man: Critique of Ramalho and Hobbs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 255–256.
McGowan, K.J., 2001. Demographic and behavioral comparisons of suburban and rural American Crows. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donelly, R. (eds.). Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell. 365–381.
Mikami, O.K., Nagata, H., 2013. No evidence of interspecific competition regulating the urban avian communities of the Kanto region, Japan. Ornithological Science 12, 43–50.
Møller, A.P., 2009. Successful city dwellers: A comparative study of the ecological characteristics of urban birds in the Western Palearctic. Oecologia 159, 849–858.
Poluda, A.M., Tsukanova, S.V., 2012. Osobennosti prostranstvenno-vremennogo raspredelenija grachej (Corvus frugilegus), svjazannyh s territoriej Ukrainy [Temporal and spatial distribution of Rook in Ukraine]. Branta 15, 103–120.
Rakhimov, I.I., 2002. Avifauna Srednego Povolzh’ja v uslovijah antropogennoj transformacii estestvennyh prirodnyh landshaftov [Birds of Middle Volga area under human transformation of natural habitats]. Novoe Znanie, Kazan’ (in Russian).
Ramalho, C.E., Hobbs, R.J., 2012. Time for a change: Dynamic urban ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 179–188.
Ravkin, E.S., Chelintsev, N.G., 1990. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po kompleksnomu marshrutnomu uchetu ptic [Manual on bird transect count]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
Robertson, O.J., McAlpine, C.A., House, A., Maron, M., 2013. Influence of interspecific competition and landscape structure on spatial homogenization of avian assemblages. PLoS One 8:e65299.
Shochat, E., Warren, P.S., Faeth, S.H., McIntyre, N.E., Hope, D., 2006. From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 186–191.
Tratalos, J., Fuller, R.A., Evans, K.L., Davies, R.G., Newson, S.E., Greenwood, J.J.D., Gaston, K.J., 2007. Bird densities are associated with household densities. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 1685–1695.