Productivity of lactating cows fed on a diet of haylage from a vetch pea-oat mixture with the introduction of new biological preservative


  • P. I. Baryshnikov Altai State Agrarian University
  • V. N. Khaustov Altai State Agrarian University
  • S. V. Burtseva Altai State Agrarian University
  • R. V. Nekrasov Altai State Agrarian University
  • M. G. Chabaev Altai State Agrarian University
  • A. А. Zelenchikova Altai State Agrarian University
  • D. A. Durnikin Altai State University
Keywords: Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactococcus lactis, Propionibacterium acidipropionici, milk productivity

Abstract

The effect of a new biological preservative representing a mix of lyophilized Lactobacillus plantarum VKPM V-4173, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis VKPM V-2092 and Propionibacterium acidipropionici VKPMV-5723 strains (40 : 40 : 20) on the quality of haylage prepared from a mix of vetch, oats, and pea has been studied. The total bacteria content in the preservative was 1·1011 CFU/g. Five different variants of conservation of alfalfa haylage prepared at the budding stage were evaluated under laboratory conditions. The variants included a self-conserved control and the preservative at two different dosages (3 and 6 g/ton) with and without the addition of cellulolytic enzymes. The best results were observed in the case of both the enzyme-free and the enzyme-containing preservative at the dosage equal to 6 g/ton. These variants provided the maximum protein content in the haylage (94.3% and 94.5% of the initial content, respectively) and a high content of lactic acid (62.9% and 65.4% of the total acid content, respectively) and also good organoleptic characteristics. The determined optimum biopreservative dosage was tested under industrial conditions using 750 tons of vetch-oats-pea haylage. The use of the biopreservative provided a high-quality haylage of high nutritive value. Industrial evaluation of the effect on the productivity of milk cattle (n = 15) of the addition of the biopreservative to the haylage showed that the maximum average daily yield of milk with basic fat content (3.4%) was obtained from cows of the experimental group whose ration included haylage prepared with the use of the studied preservative. This yield came to32.7 kg , which exceeded the yield for the control group (fed on self-conserved haylage) by 7.0%. Three months feeding of cows with the haylage prepared with the use of the new preservative brought a significant saving of money (4,862 rubles per a head at the prices of 2015–2016). 

References

Alemu, A.W., Doepel, L., 2011. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) as an alternative forage for dairy cows. Animal 5(9), 1370–1381.
Bondarev, V.A., 1975. Puti snizheniya poter’ i povysheniya kachestva silosa [Ways to reduce losses of silage quality]. Kormoproizvodstvo 10, 18–24 (in Russian).
Celis-Alvarez, M.D., López-González, F., Martínez-García, C.G., Estrada-Flores, J.G., Arriaga-Jordán, C.M., 2016. Oat and ryegrass silage for small-scale dairy systems in the highlands of central Mexico. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 48(6), 1129–1134. >> doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1063-0
Danilenko, I.A., 1972. Silos [Silage]. Kolos, Moscow (in Russian).
Dordas, C.A., Vlachostergios, D.N., Lithourgidis, A.S., 2012. Growth dynamics and agronomic-economic benefits of pea-oat and pea-barley intercrops. Crop Pasture Sci. 63,45–52. >> doi.org/10.1071/cp11181
Doré, T., Makowski, D., Malézieux, E., Munier-Jolain, N., Tchamitchian, M., Tittonell, P., 2011. Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. Eur. J. Agron. 34(4), 197–210. >> doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006
Duborezov, V.M., Vinogradov, V.N., Evstratov, A.I., Kirnos, I.O., Suslova, S.V., 2005. Progotovlenie ob’emistyh kormov s ispol’zovaniem konservantov razlichnoi prirody: Rekomendatsii [Preparation of roughage with different nature preservatives]. VIZh, Dubrovitsy (in Russian).
Eliseev, S.L., Renev, A., Reneva, I., 2014. Productivity of annual legume-grass mixtures according to interspecies competition. World Appl. Sci. J. 32(9), 1970–1973.
Fadul-Pacheco, L., Wattiaux, M.A., Espinoza-Ortega, A., Sánchez-Vera, E., Arriaga-Jordán, C.M., 2013. Evaluation of sustainability of smallholder dairy production systems in the highlands of Mexico during the rainy season. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37, 882–901. >> doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2013.775990
Guadarrama-Estrada, J., Espinoza-Ortega, A., González-Esquivel, C.E., Arriaga-Jordán, C.M., 2007. Inclusion of maize or oats-vetch silage for grazing dairy cows in small-scale campesino systems in the highlands of Central Mexico. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 32(1), 19–23. >> doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2007.9706839
Hernández-Ortega, M., Heredia-Nava, D., Espinoza-Ortega, A., Sánchez-Vera, E., Arriaga-Jordán, C.M., 2011. Effect of silage from ryegrass intercropped with winter or common vetch for grazing dairy cows in small-scale dairy systems in Mexico. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43, 947–954. >> doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9788-2
Kalashnikov, A.P., Fisinin, V.I., Shcheglov, V.V., Kleimenov, N.I. (eds.), 2003. Normy i ratsiony kormleniya selskokhozyaistvennyh zhivotnyh [Standards and ration feeding farm animals]. Rosselkhozakademiya, Moscow (in Russian).
Lithourgidis, A.S., Vsilakoglou, I.B., Dhima, K.V., Dordas, C.A., Yiakoulaki, M.D., 2006. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crop Res. 99, 106–113. >> doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.03.008
Makarova, M.M., 1962. Mikrobiologiya silosa [Microbiology of silage]. Izdatel’stvo Selskokhozyaistvennoj Literatury i Plakatov, Moscow (in Russian).
Mikhin, A.M., 1937. Silosovanie kormov v zasushlivoi zone [Silage fodder in the arid zone]. Selkhozgiz, Moscow (in Russian).
Raetskaya, Y.I., Sukhareva, V.N., Samokhin, V.T., 1979. Metodika zootehnicheskih i biohimicheskih analizov kormov, produktov obmena i zhivotnovodcheskoi produktsii [Zootechnical technique and biochemical analyzes of feed, livestock production and exchange of products]. VIZh, Dubrovitsy (in Russian).
Ross, S.M., King, J.R., O’Donovan, J.T., Spaner, D., 2004. Forage potential of intercropping berseem clover with barley, oat, or triticale. Agron. J. 96, 1013–1020. >> doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.1013
Shcheglov, V.V., Boyarskiy, L.G., 1990. Korma: Prigotovlenie, hranenie, ispolzovanie [Feed: Preparation, storage, use]. Agropromizdat, Moscow (in Russian).
Staniak, M., Jerzy Księżak, J., Bojarszczuk, J., 2014. Mixtures of legumes with cereals as a source of feed for animals. In: Pilipavicius, V. (ed.) Agricultural and biological sciences "Organic agriculture towards sustainability". In Tech.
Tuna, C., Orak, A., 2007. The role of intercropping on yield potential of Common vetch (Vicia sativa L.)/oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivated in pure stand and mixtures. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2(2), 14–19.
Vladimirov, V.L., Naumenko, P.A., Marinov, K.A., Fritberg, R.V., Bodrov, D.A., 2001. Tehnologiya prigotovleniya korma ponizhennoi vlazhnosti s primeneniem khimicheskikh konservantov [Technology of preparation of low humidity feed with chemical preservatives]. RUTs EBTZh, Dubrovitsy (in Russian).
Zafren, S.Y., 1977. Tehnologiya prigotovleniya kormov [Feed preparation technology]. Kolos, Moscow (in Russian).
Zubrilin, A.A., Mishustin, E.N., 1958. Silosovanie kormov [Silage fodder]. USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow (in Russian).
Published
2016-10-04
Section
Articles