Ecological aspect of the soil mechanical resistance in the oak forest of the steep bank
Abstract
The obtained data revealed that soil mechanical resistance is an important factor affected many essential ecological properties of the biogeocoenosis. The soil layer’s mechanical resistance of 5MP is a limitation factor for the projective cover of herbaceous vegetation. If the 5MP mechanical resistance spreads to upper soil layer up, then the the grass cover decreases. The development of the plants projective cover affects the soil animals’ trophic activity and soil electrical conductivity. The expansion of the plant cover impacts on the capasity of dead plant horizon. The decrease of the projective plant cover favours the increase of the litter mass. The litter also influences the soil animals’ trophic activity and soil electrical conductivity.References
Воробейчик Е. Л. К методике измерения мощности лесной подстилки для целей диагностики техногенных нарушений экосистем // Экология. – 1997. – № 4. – С. 265–269.
Воронов А. Г. Геоботаника. – М. : Высшая школа, 1973. – 384 с.
Козловский Ф. И. Почвенный индивидуум и методы его определения // Закономерности пространственного варьирования свойств почв и информационно-статистические методы их изучения. – М. : Наука, 1970. – С. 42–59.
Пространственная экология почвенных животных / А. Д. Покаржевский, К. Б. Гонгальский, А. С. Зайцев, Ф. А. Савин. – М. : КМК, 2007. – 174 с.
Методологические основания отображения элементарных геосистемных процессов / Ю. Г. Пузаченко, М. В. Федяева, Д. Н. Козлов, М. Ю. Пузаченко // Современные естественные и антропогенные процессы в почвах геосистем. – М. : Почв. ин-т им. В. В. Докучаева. – 2006. – С. 13–52.
Atwell B. J. The effect of compaction on wheat during early tillering: I. Growth, development and root structure // New Phytology. – 1990. – Vol. 115. – P. 29–35. >>doi.:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00918.x
Subsurface compaction reduces the root and shoot growth and grain yield of wheat / G. R. Bathke, D. K. Cassel, W. L. Hargrove, P. M. Porter // Soil Science. – 1992. – Vol. 154. – P. 316–328. >> doi.:10.1097/00010694-199210000-00008
Bengough A. G. Mechanical impedance to root growth: A review of experimental techniques and root growth responses / A. G. Bengough, C. E. Mullins // Journal Soil Science. – 1990. – Vol. 41. – P. 341–358. >> doi.:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00070.x
Field scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils / C. A. Cambardella, T. B. Moorman, J. M. Novak et al. // Soil Science Soc. Am. – 1994. – Vol. 58. – P. 1501–1511. >> doi.:10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050033x
Faechner T. Prediction of yield response to soil remediation / T. Faechner, M. J. Pyrcz, C. V. Deutsch // Geoderma. – 2000. – Vol. 97. – P. 21–38. >> doi.:10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00024-0
Misra R. K. Penetration of soil aggregates of finite size: Plant roots / R. K. Misra, A. R. Dexter, A. M. Alston // Plant Soil. – 1986. – Vol. 95. – P. 59–85. >> doi.:10.1007/BF02380590
Panayiotopoulus K. P. Compaction and penetration resistance of an alfisol and entisol and their influence on root growth of maize seedlings / K. P. Panayiotopoulus, C. P. Papadopoulou, A. Hatjiioannidou // Soil Tillage Research. – 1994. – Vol. 31. – P. 323–337. >> doi.:10.1016/0167-1987(94)90039-6
Törne E. Assessing feeding activities of soil-living animals. I. Bait-lamina-tests // Pedobiologia. – 1990. – Vol. 34. – P. 89–101.