Ecological-climatic characteristics of the flora of a floodplain landscape in Southeastern Europe
Abstract
Floodplain ecosystems take on the role of active areas of biodiversity and provide many “ecosystem services”, as evidenced by a number of European scientific references. A biodiversity analysis of river floodplains in six European countries within the temperate zone has shown that the floodplains are habitats with a high-level of structural and functional dynamics. The level of their conservation reflects the floristic diversity of forest territories, which is especially important for subarid areas. Recently, a comparison of bioecological characteristics of flora in floodplain forest areas and treeless territories was conducted on the floodplain landscapes of a subarid region of Europe. The valley-terraced landscape of the Samara River, a tributary of the Dnieper can serve as a reference site of native plant complexes of subarid territory in Eastern Europe. Despite long-term anthropogenic transformation, the landscape has retained a significant phytodiversity level. The flora of the Samara River area includes 887 plant species. Of these, 177 species belonging to the rare and endangered categories. The floodplain landscape is the richest in species and most diverse part of this complex. The flora of the Samara floodplain includes 728 species (including 132 rare ones), of which 631 grow in forest communities, and 487 – in anthropogenically transformed, treeless floodplain areas. As part of the forest flora, the number of tree and shrubby species, scyophytes, hygrophytes, and megatrophs significantly increases compared to treeless sites, and the number of ruderal plant species decreases. The floristic composition of the floodplain forests of the subarid region is much richer and more diverse than the flora of the treeless floodplain areas, and this should encourage measures for their protection and restoration. Afforestation of floodplain territories within the steppe zone of Ukraine should be a priority in comparison with other landscapes. For the protection of the flora studied, a scientific justification for creating the National Park "Samara Bor" was prepared. Under the conditions of anthropogenic and climatic impact, this article is of great global importance for attracting the attention of specialists, authorities and society to the protection and restoration of biodiversity in the most valuable landscapes.References
Akinfiyev, I. Y. (1908). Botanicheskiy ocherk Novomoskovskogo uyezda [Botanical sketch of the Novomoskovsky district]. Materialy po otsenke zemel' Yekaterinoslavskoy gubernii, Yekaterinoslav, 1–15 (in Russian).
Alekseyev, Y. Y., Bel’gard, A. L., Gubanov, I. A., Kovaleva, O. V., Tarasov, V. V., & Travleyev, A. P. (1986). Rastitel’nyy i pochvennyy pokrov Prisamar’ya Dneprovskogo [Vegetation and soil cover of the Prisamarya of Dnieper]. Izdatel’stvo DGU, Dnepropetrovsk (in Russian).
Baranovski, B. O., & Tarasov, V. V. (2010). Chervona knyha Dnipropetrovskoyi oblasti (Roslynnyy svit) [Red Book of Dnipropetrovsk region (Flora)]. Dnipropetrovsk (in Ukrainian).
Baranovsky, B. A. (2000). Rastitel’nost’ ruslovogo ravninnogo vodohranilishha [Vegetation of the channel of a lowland reservoir]. Izdatel’stvo DNU, Dnepropetrovsk (in Russian).
Baranovsky, B. А. (2017). Vydelenie novoj cenomorfy v kontekste razvitija sistemy ekomorf A. L. Bel’garda [Differentiation of new coenomorph in context of the Belgard’s ecomorph system development]. Ecology and Noospherology, 28(3–4), 16–26 (in Russian).
Bel’gard, A. L. (1950). Lesnaja rastitel’nost’ jugo-vostoka USSR [Forest vegetation of southeast Ukrainian SSR]. KGU, Kiev (in Russian).
Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2016). Evaluation of ecological niches of abundant species of Poecilus and Pterostichus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in forests of the steppe zone of Ukraine. Entomologica Fennica, 27(2), 81–100.
Elenevskij, A. G. (1978). Sistematika i geografiya veronik SSSR i prilezhashhikh stran [Systematics and geography of Veronica of the USSR and neighboring countries]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
Gorb, A. S., & Duk, N. M. (2006). Klimat Dnepropetrovskoy oblasti [Climate of the Dnipropetrovsk region]. Izdatel’stvo DNU, Dnepropetrovsk (in Russian).
Grytsan, Y. I. (2000). Ekolohichni osnovy peretvoryuyuchoho vplyvu lisovoyi roslynnosti na stepove seredovyshche [The ecological bases of transformative influence of forest vegetation on the steppe environment]. Izdatel’stvo DNU, Dnipropetrovsk (in Ukrainian).
Grytsan, Y. I., Karas, O. G., & Baranovsky, B. O. (2005). Osoblyvosti meteorolohichnykh protsesiv zaplavy (na prykladi Samarskoho boru) [Features of meteorological processes of the floodplain (on the example of the Samara Forest)]. Visnyk Kryvorizkoho Tekhnichnoho Universytetu, 10, 222–227 (in Ukrainian).
Koshelev, V. A., Pakhomov, O. Y., & Busel, V. A. (2020). The formation of sclerophilic ornythocomplexes in the quarries in the south of Ukraine and their conservation prospects. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 26(1), 411–419.
Mosyakin, S. L., & Fedoronchuk, M. M. (1999). Vascular plants of Ukraine (Nomenclatural checklist). Naukova Dumka, Kyiv.
Prokudin, J. N., & Dobrochaeva, D. N. (Eds.). (1987). Opredelitel’ vysshih rastenij Ukrainy [Identification guide to higher plants of Ukraine]. Naukova Dumka, Kiev (in Russian).
Protopopova, V. V. (1991). Sinantropnaya flora Ukrainy i puti yeyo razvitiya [Synanthropic flora of Ukraine and ways of its development]. Naukova Dumka, Kiev (in Russian).
Ramenskiy, L. G. (1971). Problemy i metody izuchenija rastitel’nogo pokrova [Problems and methods of studying vegetation]. Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian).
Tarasov, V. V. (2012). Flora Dnipropetrovs’koi’ ta Zaporiz’koi’ oblastej [Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhia regions flora]. Lira, Dnipropetrovsk (in Ukrainian).
Tarasov, V. V., Alekseyev, Y. A., & Gubanov, I. A. (1988). Rastitel’nyye resursy Prisamar’ya Dneprovskogo [Plant resources of the Prisamarya of Dnieper]. Izdatel’stvo DGU, Dnepropetrovsk (in Russian).
Vysotskiy, G. N. (1950). Ucheniye o vliyanii lesa na izmeneniye sredy yego proizrastaniya i na okruzhayushcheye prostranstvo (ucheniye o lesnoy pertinentsii) [The doctrine of the influence of the forest on the change in the environment of its growth and on the surrounding space (the doctrine of forest continent)]. Goslesbumizdat, Moscw (in Russian).