Spatial patterns of habitat distribution of Corvidae (the case of urban-rural gradient)

  • А. A. Zimaroyeva Zhytomyr National Argoecological University
  • A. V. Matsyura Altai State University
  • K. Jankowski Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities
Keywords: urban habitats, spatial distribution, abundance, Ukraine


The spatial distribution and abundance of Corvidae species in Zhytomyr region was studied in terms of the urban-rural gradient. We selected Rook (Corvus frugilegus L.), Eurasian Jackdaw (C. monedula L.), Hooded Crow (C. cornix L.), Common Raven (C. corax L.), Eurasian Magpie (Pica pica L.) and Eurasian Jay (Garrulus glandarius L.) for our observations during 2009–2012. Some 38 survey routes totaling more than 8000 km were surveyed in 21 settlements in Zhytomyr region. Among them 13 routes were in Zhytomyr city. The average density of Rooks was 55.9 birds/km2. We found a strong correlation between Rook density and rural-urban gradient and observed that the numbers of wintering Rooks in cities significantly increased due to the influx from villages. The peak number of Rooks in villages was registered in the breeding and post-breeding seasons while in the cities it was high in winter and during the spring migration. The average density of Eurasian Magpies in the study area was 8.7 birds/km2 and we registered weak correlation with the urban-rural gradient. Their maximum density in urban habitats was in the winter period whereas the highest density in rural habitats was fixed in the summer months. The density of Magpies varied insignificantly within a narrow range during the three years of research, which suggests the species has successfully adjusted to the transformed landscapes. Average density of Hooded Crows in towns was 6.6 birds/km2. The linear relationship between the urban-rural gradient and the density of this species was rather weak. In the breeding period, the birds’ density was considerably higher in urban habitats. We also registered that the average density of Hooded Crows changed insignificantly but gradually increased during the study period. The average density of Eurasian Jackdaws was 9.7 birds/km2 and had high annual dynamics. It also changed significantly during the three years of research. The average density of Eurasian Jays was 2.4 birds/km2 and varied significantly in different settlements, although the fluctuation range was small (0.1–9.3 birds/km2). We registered an expansion in the breeding distribution of Eurasian Jays in recent years i.e. the birds began to nest in old urban neighborhoods and small central parks of large cities. However, the number of birds naturally decreased along the gradient of landscape transformation. The impact of urban-rural gradient on Eurasian Jay density was significant but the correlation was weak and negative. The density of this species was highest in small villages (4.9 birds/km2) and the lowest in medium-sized cities (1.5 birds/km2). The seasonal density of Jays varied significantly and the greatest value was registered in the post-breeding period. In urban areas the birds’ density was much higher in winter compared to the nesting period, and in villages we observed the reverse situation. The number of Eurasian Jays remained almost stable in all the settlements during the study period indicating the stability of the local populations. The average density of the Common Raven was 1.3 birds/km2 and the highest density was registered in small villages (2.2 birds/km2), the lowest – in the townships (small urban type settlements) (0.6 birds/km2). The urban-rural gradient significantly affected the spatial distribution of Common Ravens, but we cannot claim an increase or decrease in their numbers along the gradient of urbanization, since the value of this indicator also depended on habitat conditions in each specific settlement. The spatial distribution of Common Ravens varied seasonally and the highest density was typical in winter due to food migrations towards human settlements.


Andersen, L., Hoerschelmann, Н., 1996. Siedlungsdichte, Reviergrosse und Bruterfolg von Rabenkrahen (Corvus corone L.) in der Grossstadlandschaft Hamburgs. Hamburg. Avifaun. Beitr. 28, 17.
Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A., 2002. Bird census techniques. Academic Press, London.
Blair, R.B, Johnson, E.M., 2008. Suburban habitats and their role for birds in the urban – rural habitat network: Points of local invasion and extinction? Landscape Ecol. 23, 1157–1169. >>
Chace, J.F, Walsh, J.J., 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landscape Urban Plan. 74, 46–69. >>
Ciach, M., 2012. The winter bird community of rural areas in the proximity of cities: low density and rapid decrease in diversity. Pol. J. Ecol. 60, 193–199.
Clergeau, P., Savard, J.P.L., Mennechez, G., Falardeau, G., 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: A comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100, 413–425. >>
Conole, L., Kirkpatrick, J.B., 2011. Functional and spatial differentiation of urban bird assemblages at the landscape scale. Landscape Urban Plan. 100, 11–23. >>
Evans, K.L., Newson, S.E., Gaston, K.J., 2009. Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis 151, 19–39. >>
Fuller, R.A., Irvine, K.N., Davies, Z.G., Armsworth, P.R., Gaston, K.J., 2012. Interactions between people and birds in urban landscapes. Stud. Avian Biol. 45, 249–266. >>
Goławski, A., Dombrowski, A., 2011. The effects of weather conditions on the numbers of wintering birds and the diversity of their assemblages in villages and crop fields in east-central Poland. Ital. J. Zool. 78, 364–369. >>
Hou, Y., Müller, F., Li, B., Kroll, F., 2015. Urban-rural gradients of ecosystem services and the linkages with socioeconomics. Landscape Online 39, 1–31. >>
Jokimäki, J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M.-L., 2012. Residential areas support overwintering possibilities of most bird species. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 49, 240–256. >>
Jokimäki, M.-L., Hakkarainen, H., Huhta, E., Inki., K, Suorsa, P., 2009. Urbanization and stability of a bird community in winter. Ecoscience 16, 502–507. >>
Kendall, W.L., Hines, J.E., Nichols, J.D., Grant, E.H., 2013. Relaxing the closure assumption in occupancy models: staggered arrival and departure times. Ecology 94(3), 607–610. >>
Laband, D.N., Lockaby, B.G., Zipperer, W.C., 2013. Urban-rural interfaces: Linking people and nature. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Crop Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, USA.
Leveau, L.M., 2013. Bird traits in urban-rural gradients: How many functional groups are there? J. Ornithol. 154, 655–662. >>
Luck, G.W., Smallbone, L.T., 2010. Species diversity and urbanization: Patterns, drivers and implications. In: Gaston K.J. (ed.) Urban ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Luniak, M., 2004. Synurbization – adaptation of animal wildlife to urban development. Proceed. 4 Int. Urban Wildlife Symp. P. 50.
Mac Nally, R., 2000. Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between and reconciliation of ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models. Biodivers. Conserv. 9, 655–671.
Marzluff, J.M., Rodewald, A.D., 2008. Conserving biodiversity in urbanizing areas: Nontraditional views from a bird’s perspective. Cities and the Environment 1(2), article 6.
Matsyura, A., Jankowski, K., Zimaroeva, A., 2015. Escape behaviours of Corvidae in an urban ecosystem of Zhytomyr (Ukraine). Romanian Journal of Biology – Zoology 60(2), 125–134.
Matsyura, A.V., Zimaroyeva, A.A., 2016. Osobennosti prostranstvennogo raspredeleniya voronovykh v usloviyakh transformirovannykh landshaftov Zhytomyrskoy oblasti [Spatial distribution of Corvidae in transformed landscapes of Zhytomyr area]. Vìsn. Dnìpropetr. Unìv. Ser. Bìol. Ekol. 22(1), 53–59 (in Russian).
McDonnell, M.J., Hahs, A.K., 2008. The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: Current status and future directions. Landscape Ecol. 23, 1143–1155. >>
McGowan, K.J., 2001. Demographic and behavioral comparisons of suburban and rural American Crows. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donelly, R., (eds.) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell. >>
Møller, A.P., Diaz, M., Flensted-Jensen, E., Grim, T., Iba’nez-Alamo, J.D., Jokimaki, J.-M., Marko, G., Tryjanowski, P., 2012. High urban population density of birds reflects their timing of urbanization. Oecologia 170, 867–875. >>
Otto, W., Witt, K., 2002. Verbreitung und Bestand Berliner Brutvőgel. Berl. Ornithol. Ber. 12, Special Issue.
Poluda, A.M., Tsukanova, S.V., 2012. Osobennosti prostranstvenno-vremennogo raspredelenija grachej (Corvus frugilegus), svjazannyh s territoriej Ukrainy [Temporal and spatial distribution of Rook in Ukraine]. Branta 15, 103–120 (in Russian).
Radford, K.G., James, P., 2013. Changes in the value of ecosystem services along a rural-urban gradient: A case study of Greater Manchester, UK. Landscape Urban Plan. 109, 117–127. >>
Ramalho, C.E., Hobbs, R.J., 2012. Time for a change: Dynamic urban ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 179–188. >>
Ravkin, E.S., Chelintsev, N.G., 1990. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po kompleksnomu marshrutnomu uchetu ptic [Manual on bird transect count]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
Strohbach, M.V., Haase, D., Kabish, N., 2009. Birds and the city: Urban biodiversity, land use, and socioeconomics. Ecol. Soc. 14, 31. >>
Tratalos, J., Fuller, R.A., Evans, K.L., Davies, R.G., Newson, S.E., Greenwood, J.J.D., Gaston, K.J., 2007. Bird densities are associated with household densities. Glob. Chang. Biol. 13, 1685–1695. >>
Tryjanowski, P., Sparks, T.H., Kuźniak, S., Czechowski, P., Jerzak, L., 2013. Bird migration advances more strongly in urban environments. PLoS One 8(5), e63482. >>
Tryjanowski, P., Skórka, P., Sparks, T.H., Biaduń, W., Brauze, T., Hetmański, T., Wysocki, D., 2015a. Urban and rural habitats differ in number and type of bird feeders and in bird species consuming supplementary food. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 22(19), 15097–15103. >>
Tryjanowski, P., Sparks, T.H., Biaduń, W., Brauze, T., Hetmański, T., Martyka, R., Wysocki, D., 2015b. Winter bird assemblages in rural and urban environments: A national survey. PLoS ONE 10(6), e0130299.>>